Jump to content
Create New...

delta10

Hero Member
  • Posts

    1,122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    delta10 reacted to chippy95 in Leora Fan Page (2015 - 2016)   
    At this moment in time probably the only reason I check into RLC she doesn't spend all time hiding or on a bloody laptop like someone else I could name (leave that to you to guess...it's not hard)  To me she is a lot of what RLC is all about, she lives a life and give us solo treats as well.......Well done Leora...........shame about Paul
  2. Like
    delta10 got a reaction from Kazoo in I SUGGEST WE STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT RLC (WHY?)   
    It is difficult to comment without knowing what the tenants agree to in their contract with RLC.
    Certainly living with cameras following your every move is not normal and of course they will record the downs as well as the ups of life but that is what they are being paid for.
    For example
    - are they expected to be in the apartment for an average of so many hours a week
    - is anything stated about clothes
     
    I do presume at least an element of the payment is based on how many are viewing the cameras hence to maximise their income the tenants need to be doing things to attract viewers, sex is just one, simple things like what they are / are not wearing will also change viewings.
     
    One thing I see as wrong is intentionally evading the cameras by hiding out of view for long periods.
     
    Also they ought not to be naive enough not to know/presume a site like this exists.
     
    I consider RLC as fundamentally different to any sex site since, while there is debate about scripting, overall what happens is not directed. Not all aspects of the tenants lives is interesting to watch but there has to be enough that is. Also while I have looked in more over the last few days my time will be far more limited again after next week. To consider subscribing there would something interesting in at least one apartment most times during the hour I log in for and over the last few days I have not seen that.
     
    I have not intended my posts to be critical of RLC but rather constructive. As to my comments on individuals these are simply my ' thoughts out loud ' of behaviour at the time. Take Ilona who I perceive is spoiling that apartment for Irma and Anna with end result that not enough happening to be worth subscribing. If regularly during the time I looked in they were topless, nude, doing exercises, massages etc. it would be different. Hence my comments that the apartment would be more interesting without her.
     
    I hope this is helpful.
  3. Like
    delta10 got a reaction from tim stoakes in I SUGGEST WE STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT RLC (WHY?)   
    It is difficult to comment without knowing what the tenants agree to in their contract with RLC.
    Certainly living with cameras following your every move is not normal and of course they will record the downs as well as the ups of life but that is what they are being paid for.
    For example
    - are they expected to be in the apartment for an average of so many hours a week
    - is anything stated about clothes
     
    I do presume at least an element of the payment is based on how many are viewing the cameras hence to maximise their income the tenants need to be doing things to attract viewers, sex is just one, simple things like what they are / are not wearing will also change viewings.
     
    One thing I see as wrong is intentionally evading the cameras by hiding out of view for long periods.
     
    Also they ought not to be naive enough not to know/presume a site like this exists.
     
    I consider RLC as fundamentally different to any sex site since, while there is debate about scripting, overall what happens is not directed. Not all aspects of the tenants lives is interesting to watch but there has to be enough that is. Also while I have looked in more over the last few days my time will be far more limited again after next week. To consider subscribing there would something interesting in at least one apartment most times during the hour I log in for and over the last few days I have not seen that.
     
    I have not intended my posts to be critical of RLC but rather constructive. As to my comments on individuals these are simply my ' thoughts out loud ' of behaviour at the time. Take Ilona who I perceive is spoiling that apartment for Irma and Anna with end result that not enough happening to be worth subscribing. If regularly during the time I looked in they were topless, nude, doing exercises, massages etc. it would be different. Hence my comments that the apartment would be more interesting without her.
     
    I hope this is helpful.
  4. Like
    delta10 got a reaction from BORN-TO-RIDE in I SUGGEST WE STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT RLC (WHY?)   
    It is difficult to comment without knowing what the tenants agree to in their contract with RLC.
    Certainly living with cameras following your every move is not normal and of course they will record the downs as well as the ups of life but that is what they are being paid for.
    For example
    - are they expected to be in the apartment for an average of so many hours a week
    - is anything stated about clothes
     
    I do presume at least an element of the payment is based on how many are viewing the cameras hence to maximise their income the tenants need to be doing things to attract viewers, sex is just one, simple things like what they are / are not wearing will also change viewings.
     
    One thing I see as wrong is intentionally evading the cameras by hiding out of view for long periods.
     
    Also they ought not to be naive enough not to know/presume a site like this exists.
     
    I consider RLC as fundamentally different to any sex site since, while there is debate about scripting, overall what happens is not directed. Not all aspects of the tenants lives is interesting to watch but there has to be enough that is. Also while I have looked in more over the last few days my time will be far more limited again after next week. To consider subscribing there would something interesting in at least one apartment most times during the hour I log in for and over the last few days I have not seen that.
     
    I have not intended my posts to be critical of RLC but rather constructive. As to my comments on individuals these are simply my ' thoughts out loud ' of behaviour at the time. Take Ilona who I perceive is spoiling that apartment for Irma and Anna with end result that not enough happening to be worth subscribing. If regularly during the time I looked in they were topless, nude, doing exercises, massages etc. it would be different. Hence my comments that the apartment would be more interesting without her.
     
    I hope this is helpful.
×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search