Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you like the new couples and what RLC has been doing this month, then send them a nice email. Remind them that they have members who appreciate what they do...even if you already show appreciation by paying a standard or premium membership.

And, no, I do not work for RLC.  It just seems like they have been listening and have done what they could do to fulfill members' demands.  

Posted

At the risk of offending you, I'll respectfully beg to differ....I had a regular membership for a bit and was very disappointed.

Leora hasn't spent as much time lately wandering around naked and hides in the doorway to change in the morning. No guests staying over....

Alina has been less inclined to wander around naked and has been seen covering up when passing by cameras. The chubby girl is interesting if that's your thing...

Maya is great...always has been. Hate the tattoo,  but that's my opinion. Too bad her guests hide to change.

Saw Veronica in the shower once...  never nude again..... Lovely girl, generous curves, hate the tattoos, but that's my opinion again.

Adriana. Lovely girl, tall and lean, but a waste of an apartment for the purposes of RLC.

Marta... more money for one more apartment when the others aren't worth it to begin with? Nah...

Dasha... have yet to see her naked. Pretty enough....

Sofia... Again, lovely girl, nice curves, but it's a waste of an apartment.

Diana...  Top notch...  the other couples need to take lessons....

So... out of the 9 apartments, to me, only 2 apartments are great, a couple others may be interesting on occasion, the others, well...  not worth bothering....

Posted

I have to agree with wiseacres. I have seen Dasha nude and although the couples are improving over what they were, there is still a lot of room for improvement.

Posted

At the risk of offending you, I'll respectfully beg to differ....I had a regular membership for a bit and was very disappointed.

Leora hasn't spent as much time lately wandering around naked and hides in the doorway to change in the morning. No guests staying over....

Alina has been less inclined to wander around naked and has been seen covering up when passing by cameras. The chubby girl is interesting if that's your thing...

Maya is great...always has been. Hate the tattoo,  but that's my opinion. Too bad her guests hide to change.

Saw Veronica in the shower once...  never nude again..... Lovely girl, generous curves, hate the tattoos, but that's my opinion again.

Adriana. Lovely girl, tall and lean, but a waste of an apartment for the purposes of RLC.

Marta... more money for one more apartment when the others aren't worth it to begin with? Nah...

Dasha... have yet to see her naked. Pretty enough....

Sofia... Again, lovely girl, nice curves, but it's a waste of an apartment.

Diana...  Top notch...  the other couples need to take lessons....

So... out of the 9 apartments, to me, only 2 apartments are great, a couple others may be interesting on occasion, the others, well...  not worth bothering....

I see so many posts on here where members think these people we are observing are required to get naked/have sex etc. I don't recall seeing anywhere on the RLC website that it is a requirement (nor is it promised) that they will show tits/ass/pussy/cock or anything inbetween (please correct me if I'm wrong). As for the sex idea - pretty sure this isn't a porn site as such or else they'd probably call it RealSexCams instead. I can see why you were disappointed though. I think it's less about them not delivering enough nudity/sex and more that your expectations are not RLC's ideas on how they should run the site maybe, but each to their own. 

Either way I'm enjoying the site again (after a hiatus) and although I agree with your view on the apartment Marta and David have (I think all the apartments should have as much coverage as their apartment does) I'm happy to pay my Premium membership for what I'm seeing.

Posted

I guess some people don't read what's posted before posting their own opinions.  But, that's okay, I've been guilty of that too.

Just so you know, there wasn't any room for disagreement there.  My statement begins with, "IF YOU LIKE..." 

It was a suggestion to the ones who actually are happy with the improvements...not for the ones who are disappointed.  Maybe I should have made that more clear.

But, if you are so disappointed, might I suggest you contact RLC and let them know.  And, if that's not good enough and you really dislike the couples that much, then I have to ask, "Why are you here?"  If you want porn, then go to xhamster.  This site is for voyeurs.

Posted

Arlando: We all know this is not a porn site and nothing states the couples "HAVE" to perform sex and walk around naked. But RLC does use this as an advertising incemtive to join and these couples know it is a voyeur site and that is why they are paid, so there is nothing wrong with expecting it once in a while. Not all the time like rabbits, but often enough. If anyone remembers Laura and Max, Alma and her asshole boyfriend and Isabelle they were nice to watch and they didn't have sex or walk around naked all the time, but they did have sex on a regular basis and didn't cover themselves with a blanket or go to a hidden corner to do it. That is what people are asking for. If the couples are going to be paid BY THE CUSTOMERS on a voyeur site they should realize they are not being paid to sneak to a hidden part of the apartment or under the blankets. I have written to RLC about a couple of things but haven't noticed any changes.

Posted

Arlando: We all know this is not a porn site and nothing states the couples "HAVE" to perform sex and walk around naked. But RLC does use this as an advertising incemtive to join and these couples know it is a voyeur site and that is why they are paid, so there is nothing wrong with expecting it once in a while. Not all the time like rabbits, but often enough. If anyone remembers Laura and Max, Alma and her asshole boyfriend and Isabelle they were nice to watch and they didn't have sex or walk around naked all the time, but they did have sex on a regular basis and didn't cover themselves with a blanket or go to a hidden corner to do it. That is what people are asking for. If the couples are going to be paid BY THE CUSTOMERS on a voyeur site they should realize they are not being paid to sneak to a hidden part of the apartment or under the blankets. I have written to RLC about a couple of things but haven't noticed any changes.

FRENCHY.. I wonder why you are talking on behalf of RLC... Imagine this site was all about ordinary life of certain people but without nudity or sex>>> What would you do then SIR?????? The main issue of this site is nudity and sex.. People are not going to pay money just to watch people cooking in their kitchens and playing on their laptops.. 

Posted

I beg to differ : I agree with FRENCHY , I enjoy watching couples in everyday activities , (the sex thrown is is a nice bonus) but not the main reason I joined RLC . Bet there are quite a few members that joined for the voyeur concept .

Posted

MEE4YOUU: I think you should read my post again. I am not speaking for RLC. I said people enjoy watshing everyday lives, and I do, but that the main reason people pay is to watch the couples have sex WITHOUT blankets and not in hidden spaces.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search