Do you think RLC prices are fair?

[BatDan]

Honestly, to me, 30 a month seems ridiculous for standard. It feels rare that you find something interesting being that you only have 7 cameras, and honestly if I'm paying for porn, I should be able to enjoy it EVERY TIME I LOG ON. Plus in order to afford 30 a month, you must have some sort of job, which tends to limit the time that you can be on RLC. If something doesn't happen in your free time, then tough luck. It's even more difficult if you live in the states too because most of the standard times are so different that in order to see anything interesting you have to be on early in the morning or the right time in the afternoon, which usually people are either asleep or working at those times. Hell I'm online right now and the only thing even close to what I came here for is Zoya taking a shower. Everyone else is asleep, and that's every time I log on, simply because my free time lies within the time that these people sleep, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. 

 

Honestly, I feel if RLC toned their basic subscription down to 15 a month they'd get a lot more money out of me, I'd be subscribed every month to be honest, being a student having 30 dollars to spare isn't always easy.  

 

45 a month for fapping is just ridiculous on its own

 

What do you all think about their prices? 

[Mkay]

I think it's too much, but then again. There is servers, cameras etc. that has to be payed.

 

Maybe they should start charging pr. hour or so, so when you see something interesting, you pay for an hour? Maybe 1-2 each hour.

[stevec]

Yeah it is too expensive. I know they have cameras and servers running 24/7 but as a customer you don't really get a lot for your money. As a free viewer you get access to 12 apartments with 33 cameras between them. For a standard membership at a cost of $30/£25/€27 you get 0 extra apartments and about 40 extra cameras. Premium members get 3 extra apartments and about 50 extra cams for $45/£37/€41. It doesn't sound too bad but the extra cams aren't worth all that much as there is plenty of sex and nudity on the free cams. I would much rather pay for more apartments than more cameras.

I wouldn't mind paying the current prices if they had more apartments and in different time zones as then you would always have something interesting going on. Most of the apartments now are just dead and uninteresting. As long as Nelly and Bogdan, Masha and Sasha, Maya and Stepan, Desiree and Raul, Leora and Paul are still having regular sex on the free cams, I don't see the point in paying that much money to watch them sleep. Maybe if they had a gallery of saved videos of all the sex it would make it worth the money.

So far in my time with RLC the number of apartments has been dropping.

[Capeguy]

20 minutes ago, stevec said:

Yeah it is too expensive. I know they have cameras and servers running 24/7 but as a customer you don't really get a lot for your money. As a free viewer you get access to 12 apartments with 33 cameras between them. For a standard membership at a cost of $30/£25/€27 you get 0 extra apartments and about 40 extra cameras. Premium members get 3 extra apartments and about 50 extra cams for $45/£37/€41. It doesn't sound too bad but the extra cams aren't worth all that much as there is plenty of sex and nudity on the free cams. I would much rather pay for more apartments than more cameras.

I wouldn't mind paying the current prices if they had more apartments and in different time zones as then you would always have something interesting going on. Most of the apartments now are just dead and uninteresting. As long as Nelly and Bogdan, Masha and Sasha, Maya and Stepan, Desiree and Raul, Leora and Paul are still having regular sex on the free cams, I don't see the point in paying that much money to watch them sleep. Maybe if they had a gallery of saved videos of all the sex it would make it worth the money.

So far in my time with RLC the number of apartments has been dropping.

First comment: RLC does NOT advertise itself as a 'porn' site nor do they promise you will ever see ANY kind of sex on camera. If all I wanted was to see porn I would use one of the many free sites which are readily available and go from one porn clip of my choosing to the next. There is enough out there to view 24 hrs a day for eternity.

Second: I think we would all like to see the apts spread across more time zones. Most probably has to do with RLC limiting the number of countries where they have to do licensing; which can be much more restrictive in some. 

Third: The current number of apts is pretty constant; 2 just disappeared recently but 2 were added over the summer so no net gain/loss. 

[bossman]

I personally would like to see more frequent additions to the gallery as when I joined a few years ago it was constantly updated daily. This could be a paid job for someone as I'm sure everyone would be glad to pay for the highlights that are often discussed in the chat but never seen.

I have paid the membership for the gallery but when it needs renewing I will do what everyone else does and make a number of comments for free access, which should not be allowed as it needs funding.

There we go, that my frustration relieved. (Note: "my frustration").

Just for the record I do leave some comments to those who I think have made a special effort and not for personal gain.

 

    

[stevec]

21 minutes ago, capeguy said:

First comment: RLC does NOT advertise itself as a 'porn' site nor do they promise you will ever see ANY kind of sex on camera. If all I wanted was to see porn I would use one of the many free sites which are readily available and go from one porn clip of my choosing to the next. There is enough out there to view 24 hrs a day for eternity.

Second: I think we would all like to see the apts spread across more time zones. Most probably has to do with RLC limiting the number of countries where they have to do licensing; which can be much more restrictive in some. 

Third: The current number of apts is pretty constant; 2 just disappeared recently but 2 were added over the summer so no net gain/loss. 

I know RLC isn't a porn site (even though they charge porn site prices) but the sex and nudity is kind of expected if you are paying to watch a camera in someones bedroom or bathroom. I agree with you that if you just want to watch porn there are plenty of free sites to do so. I don't come to RLC for the sex I just like to see people living their everyday lives which is why I'm happy as a free viewer but it seems as though the majority of RLC users are mainly interested in the sex. Just look at these forums, the majority of posts are sexulized in some way. I'm just saying people seem to buy the membership under the assumption that they will be able to see more sex which isn't the case.

Fair enough about your last point, I thought we had lost more apartments.

[Capeguy]

Just now, stevec said:

I know RLC isn't a porn site (even though they charge porn site prices) but the sex and nudity is kind of expected if you are paying to watch a camera in someones bedroom or bathroom. I agree with you that if you just want to watch porn there are plenty of free sites to do so. I don't come to RLC for the sex I just like to see people living their everyday lives which is why I'm happy as a free viewer but it seems as though the majority of RLC users are mainly interested in the sex. Just look at these forums, the majority of posts are sexulized in some way. I'm just saying people seem to buy the membership under the assumption that they will be able to see more sex which isn't the case.

Fair enough about your last point, I thought we had lost more apartments.

Of course we go there for sex, I never disagreed on that, just that is is not promised but certainly expected. RLC would be gone in about 2 mos. if there was no sex. My primary complaint with the is what I consider false advertising of the  24x7 claim. Because there are not cams on the balconies at D&D, K&K and Barcelona 2 (Lola) we miss a LOT of stuff because they go there a lot. At D&D you can see a 15-20 person party disappear out there for hours. Same at Lola and K&K. I have complained many times to RLC and it all falls on deaf wallets.

 

[texl01]

Hi fellas, just a little clarification :  RLCF and RLC are separate sites.  We were informed by an Admin. staffer the sites are not related. They are separate entities.

As far as RLCF Gallery goes, every Video and Picture posted there, the Member is in breach of RLC  policies (agreed upon when joining RLC by member) and is copy right protected. Posting from that site can lead to being banned from RLC.  

Images, Vid.& Pics from RLC site appear on some Porn Sites. These are uploaded by Third Party Hosting Services . Once RLC see these Images and/or Videos on Third Party Hosts they Order a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act ) Take Down Order of the content. This order must be complied with and Take Down usually occurs in 3 to 5 minutes.

RLCF has it's own Servers for storing content, and it appears RLC have at times been lenient with our Gallery Posts. 

Edited by texl01 

[bossman]

17 minutes ago, texl01 said:

Hi fellas, just a little clarification :  RLCF and RLC are separate sites.  We were informed by an Admin. staffer the sites are not related. They are separate entities.

As far as RLCF Gallery goes, every Video and Picture posted there, the Member is in breach of RLC  policies (agreed upon when joining RLC by member) and is copy right protected. Posting from that site can lead to being banned from RLC.  

Images, Vid.& Pics from RLC site appear on some Porn Sites. These are uploaded by Third Party Hosting Services . Once RLC see these Images and/or Videos on Third Party Hosts they Order a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act ) Take Down Order of the content. This order must be complied with and Take Down usually occurs in 3 to 5 minutes.

RLCF has it's own Servers for storing content, and it appears RLC have at times been lenient with our Gallery Posts. 

Edited by texl01 

It doesn't take much to confuse me but can you please clarify. Does the gallery obtained from the top of this page belong to RLC or RLCF?, if it is RLCF then am I to assume anyone uploading on this site will be banned. sorry to be a bit dim but I don't understand what you mean regarding "RLCF has it's own servers".  

[BobRoss123]

I miss the 3 day trials for 7.99  I enjoy the site but it's hard to defend paying that monthly cost of 30 dollars but like you said the Standard plan sucks because too me I have a hard time seeing a difference between the standard and premium apts other then the stupid tease parties. But thats like 44month Too high if you do the yearly cost. So I've been forced to lurking for a while now The trial worked out for me because I can't always be on the website but some days are better then others.

[texl01]

 Hi Bossman, The Gallery (top of page ) is owned by Reallifecamfan - RLCF.  It is correct  - Anyone uploading to the Gallery risks being banned from RLC.   RLCF will not ban you for posting their material. 

"There was a server , Anony.ws which was quite reliable but their Servers suddenly shut down. Any content on our Forum from their Servers now shows a blank spot where content once  sat. "  ( taken from Post by StdCld316  - late Sept 2016  Forum Page) 

[texl01]

You are all welcome to ventilate here or in an appropriate related topic page in the Forum. Your concerns are read by the REALLIFECAMFAM (RLCF )  Members , many of whom are also Members of REALLIFECAM (RLC ). 

I suggest your issues with Pricing , Camera locations, Time zones, etc be directed, directly to Reallifecam Administration as they are the ears these valid points should fall upon.  I hope this makes sense as the two sites are unrelated Administration wise as far as I have been informed. 

 Please do think I am being a smart arse as I am only trying to clarify it for you Guys and Girls.       Cheers -  Texl.

[Rob1]

I wouldn't pay nothing for fake rlc i want it for free

[delta10]

My thought is there should be be two-tier pricing. One price for unlimited viewing and a second much lower price for a maximum number of hours, perhaps 100 or just over 3 per day, over up to month.

If the viewing is so interesting the hours are used up of then renewal can be after less than 30 days. This would be an incentive for RLC to keep the viewing interesting.

[bossman]

1 hour ago, texl01 said:

 Hi Bossman, The Gallery (top of page ) is owned by Reallifecamfan - RLCF.  It is correct  - Anyone uploading to the Gallery risks being banned from RLC.   RLCF will not ban you for posting their material. 

"There was a server , Anony.ws which was quite reliable but their Servers suddenly shut down. Any content on our Forum from their Servers now shows a blank spot where content once  sat. "  ( taken from Post by StdCld316  - late Sept 2016  Forum Page) 

Thank you for clarifying. If I could figure out how to upload content I would load it all as I too have cancelled my membership so it doesn't matter if they ban me. Membership runs out in December so I will collect as many clips as possible and learn how to upload.

Just a thought but what's stopping someone passing a video to a non-member of RLC and that person uploaded it to the RLCF gallery.

Thank you again