Jump to content
Create New...

DoILookFatInThisUsername

Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DoILookFatInThisUsername

  1. To be honest I just wouldn't want my place sinking of smoke...
  2. Sure your IP wasn't banned?...... I'm not a member of staff, but I do have software experience, what you're describing is an intentional server thing, not a client bug....
  3. The only people I have a massive problem with is C&J RLC isn't a porn site, it's a voyeur site. They're allowed to be as boring or non-sexually active as they want to be. But purposely hiding in an unmonitored room to purposely avoid the cameras? No.
  4. There'd better be some damn good stuff on his laptop for him to ignore her on the sofa so much...
  5. Carla was really strange with the dog; one moment she was pushing his/her(?) head on the floor or physically pushing it away, and the next second petting it like nothing happened. Bit concerning.
  6. What's wrong with the current payment option?....
  7. Never liked Lev, there's just something about him that feels iffy. I wish he'd stop playing with his balls as well.
  8. They go hand in hand really, I guess RLCF feels like more of an extension to it. Wouldn't say I enjoy one more than the other though, they're both for different purposes.
  9. Does this thread mean Paul actually has sex with Leora?...who'd have thunk it.
  10. Speaking from a software developer standpoint, it wouldn't not (sorry for the double neg) be a big issue. It wouldn't be impossible, but still a pain. They probably do keep backups just in case, but it'd more than likely be a backup server nobody bothers with. The size of it is pretty easy(ish) to manage, assuming it's ~2.5MB/minute * 60 * 24 = 3.6GB per camera, x average of 8 cameras per apartment (I'm guessing) = ~29GB per 24 hours for an apartment, x 13 = ~ 374GB per 24 hours. It's not an impossible size, but it wouldn't be as simple as just keeping a backup video anymore. They're not going to straight up send you a constant stream of 3.6GB, so they'd need something set up to handle requests for a specific time (e.g. segment the video), which would probably cause a lot more requests to the server than they currently get. Having said that, they'd probably need to setup an additional server to act as content delivery. Because of the nature of the site, most existing solutions would probably reject it. Not worth the hassle for their current user base. EDIT: Also having highlights would be more difficult. It's either automated, which wouldn't be very accurate for what users want, or manual, which would be a headache. The easiest way to improve RLC is to get better apartments.
  11. Everyone already knows the girls apartment is going nowhere, there's twelve other apartments, I don't see why people get this annoyed about it. If you want some lesbian porn, google it?
  12. I've cancelled my sub too, some of the apartments have gotten a little better, but Chloe and Josh, Anna gone, a good number of flats filled by strangers...not worth it.
  13. Nah, was disappointing, he only lasted four minutes. Pretty bad by any standard.
  14. Does it really matter which apartment they come from?...
  15. I think it depends on where it's hosted, i.e. geographical location of their servers. Don't quote me on that though, not entirely sure myself
  16. @rob I can understand why they wouldn't have kids on RLC. It goes without saying; there's a lot of weirdos in this world. Also since the site is for entertainment purposes only, they'd have a bunch of legal constraints with minors.
  17. It's surreal how they just pop up in a different apartment. Do a lot of them know each other then? I thought they'd all be strangers to one another (sorry for the question that probably has an obvious answer - only just joined.)
  18. I don't think RLC is too bad, but some of the apartments are just dead boring. I dunno, I don't like to criticise it too much because even though we're paying, we still don't exactly have the right to demand what they do with their life. @greentag No, VV is crap.
  19. Out of curiosity; has anyone tried other voyeur sites? I'm wondering how they compare. I did quickly check out Voyeur Villa but it doesn't look great, not something I'd pay for at least.
  20. They always do that, I remember it toggling the active icon for the cameras like crazy once even though all the lights in the flat were off, found out they were running to the closet after
×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search