The discussion in chatbox was more along the lines of why would they go off camera? I'm no lawyer either, but it seems to me, the idea of a voyeur site is to charge customers a fee to watch all aspects of the individuals lives. And I quote, "The private life of other people live 24/7". I may be interpreting this wrong, but to me, that says the individuals should go about their daily business as if the cameras weren't there. When they actively seek an area where there are no cameras, to do whatever they want to do "privately", they're depriving us of the very service we pay for. I understand about toilets and such, nobody should want to see that, but everything else should be covered. Just my opinion. It's like buying a ticket to the buffet, only to be told the desserts are off limits.