eyenthesky

da

think so - minimal time to travel between apartments

Dougie, you nailed it!  I must confess that I follow a lot of the girls in their social media pages.  As a long time subscriber to RLC (don't even mention VHTV in the same sentence) I'm just naturally curious how the girls lives play out in the real world.  Some of them allow access to their social media pages and some restrict them.  Seeing what happens in their REAL life helps me filter out all the spurious speculation from some of our "free thinking" posters (ie. Christy is going to Davos to turn tricks) and helps me discriminate the knowledgeable posters from the whack jobs (who will respond with child-like profanities whenever they feel threatened).  I don't see it as a form of stalking, but rather as a way of rounding out the RLC experience.  I only wish the best for all the girls who have participated in the project.

Look, I've managed to make a post without grammatical errors, misspellings, or a single profanity! Take note, Temp, Rubberman, et al.

I'm just tired of reading the same "everyone must go" statements by a few individuals day after day after day.  I used to be a frequent participant in the chat room, but why bother any more.  Too much bitching and whining.

thanks!

any chance the developers can allow us to access archived chat like we could before?  it's one of the mainreasons I subscribed to this site.

Looks Like Nelie spent some of her bonus money on an "enhancement".  Nice to see them back!

where have you been?

On 9/17/2018 at 1:36 AM, CowArt said:

B1 should just be B1. It has sentimental value for many, and I never understood why the new house was named B1 in the first place. Besides, us oldtimers have difficulty handling change... 

Why not keep the naming here the same as at camcaps (and as has been suggested by a few her already)? Now it looks like it's just different for the sake of being different.

B1 = Irma, Danaya, Karol

B2 = Alexa, Amina, Valeria

B3 = Couples on Vacation

B4/GP = Mary, Bridget, Megan, Dina, Shaila, Tina, Anita.

woorks for me.  B1 never stopped being B1.

On 11/8/2017 at 4:27 AM, Alittle said:

The scarring will be minimal depending how the plastic surgeon sewed her skin together and after a while you won't really see them in the crease of the breast. Do you know if the incision was done under the breasts? 

under the breasts.  the scarring looks just like mashas.

5 hours ago, Alittle said:

Awww...suck it up buttercup. RLC cannot force anyone to have sex or do anything they do not want to on cams. IT IS ILLEGAL.  Also they cannot force tenants to stay in the apartments 24/7 either. IT IS ILLEGAL. I see many complaints from people about certain apartments not being home or doing stuff because YOU pay a membership??? GET REAL!! You are paying for what you get...people living in apartments for free doing whatever the hell they do. I don't think RLC will miss receiving your money dude, since there are other suckers like you paying up. 

I take it you're not a paying member then?  If you don't play the game, you don't get to make the rules.  What's the difference between hiding under the covers or in a hidden area of the apartment, or just putting a cover over the cameras?  RLC doesn't seem to go along with that too well.  Paying for this subscription gives me the right to bitch, and also lets people like you watch for free.

like it's going to make a difference, but I just sent another e-mail.

Once again, one of the tenants, Sophie, has decided to take her activities off camera by hiding in the bathroom while she has sex.  I have written previous complaints about this behaviour in the past, but have never received a reply.  I fell that this type of behaviour is cheating your paying clients and is the same thing as covering up the cameras in the rooms.  

4 hours ago, Booffer69 said:

 

All valid points, but in my mind it's the same thing as putting a cover directly over the camera lens.  Judging by Nicole's warpaint show last night, their little tease didn't go over well with someone else besides the viewers.

On 7/27/2017 at 8:52 PM, capeguy said:

 

That's the reason I pay for all my software, movies, and music.  Somebody expended efforts (read $$$) to create all of the content that I listen to, watch, or use on my computer (in the last case, to generate $$$ of my own), so they have a right to fair recompensation.  If the quality of what they offer didn't have a price, it wouldn't be worth having.

e-mail to RLC regarding the Sophie/Nicole escapades

I just watched Nicole and Sophie spending at least an hour of “real life” together hidden under a tent they made with the bedcover in Sophies room.  Clearly this was in order to obscure their actions from the viewership.

martina and alberto, cam 1 08:32 - cat humps dog in living room. M&A bedroom 13:43 - Martina begins BJ on Alberto.

good work here....  Our own Noldus!

On 7/22/2017 at 4:49 PM, CowArt said:

Pictures in the gallery, administrators posting videos hosted on third party websites. RLCF has made up it's mind, the only way to keep traffic going is the public exchange of copyrighted material, and of course this game is all about page views and google rankings... Is there a way to backup a PM of have it sent to your email? I have a couple with ton if information in it I really would hate losing when the site gets taken down again.

I've taken all of my important correspondence with members like you and cut and pasted it into a word document that stays on my hard drive.  That lets me delete some correspondence that would otherwise fill up my mailbox.

On 7/19/2017 at 5:54 PM, toolmaker123 said:

 

  Some have been sharing through third party host with videos and pictures through PM. We've done very well staying under the radar.

Exactly!  over time, and through experience, you gain a good feeling of the person you are dealing with and build up a measure of trust; online frienships develop, and we all feel closer to each other.  A community gets built.  Thats the best thing about the site.

On 7/20/2017 at 0:28 PM, texl01 said:

One the new features is the ability to create create "clubs" which are essentially private groups. I will provide more details later, but it has a lot of new features that think will be very beneficial for us. 

 

This sounds like a great idea!  I'd be even more involved in chat ( when I have the chance to log on in the first place) if I didn't have to wade through page after page of conspiacy theories about "what's going on in the hidden rooms.  How would you go about establishing a private room?  Who would be the first members?  Would it be visible to others on the main chatbox who haven't been invited?  

and don't be afraid to jump into the chat room!

Geronimo and SZfDJ - I've sent e-mails in the past to cust support when things were getting out of hand (Vanessa quickly comes to mind), but they were only in instances where I saw potential harm about to come to someone.  I haven't seen any of the supposed "drug abuse" by Gina, but in the case of that party at B2 last year, with the drug boys and the coke snorting in the bathroom, you could clearly see it happening.  I sent a complaint to RLC about that one only because it appeared a crime was being committed, and I worried about the possible ramifications to the overall health of RLC if one of the wasted girls got abused by the men that were there in the apartment. Also, in the case of Gina, the only thing that would have made me launch another e-mail was the fact that she was totally out of it, and stumbling around on the balcony, with no one around to intercede. (I wasn't online to see this, only going off what others said).  I agree with you two on the idea that we let them live their lives, whether we agree to their lifestlye or not, but I will still do whatever is in my power to prevent possible harm to one of the tenants.  Just my two cents.

On 5/20/2017 at 10:45 AM, Plank said:

Is it something like James Bond 007?
Agent 69, license to perv?

This keeps coming up in the Chatbox,so I just wondered?
Years ago I remember that there was a problem with newbies arriving and wanting access to the Gallery & asking all sorts of odd questions. I know the Mods felt that these might be spies sent out by RLC to infiltrate our ranks.
But at that time there was a 'gentleman's agreement' between them and our old boss BTR that allowed stuff to be posted to the Gallery, within reason.
But since BTR left us we have seen the watermarks come in and a general clamp down by rlc on anyone posting anything anywhere, also resulting in members being banned.
This has had an adverse effect on our Gallery.
So it can't be that, because it's been going on for a while now?

Is an rlc agent something like an Estate/Property Agent a Representative of some sort? Here to sell their site to us,encourage membership etc, probably not because they don't seem to like any form of customer feedback or suggestion. (see above)

I am confused because it keeps coming up in the Chatbox when certain members want to talk about one subject and others don't.
If you try and change the subject or challenge a viewpoint a phrase get's used along these lines, 'are you an rlc agent?', 'you are an agent of rlc'? etc etc
Obviously sent here to run a covert mission of subterfuge,to throw people off the real story/issue etc.

I wonder if the ones accusing people of being rlc agents are in fact double agents, claiming that they are on our side,when really they are agents, sent by dark forces to confuse,undermine,run-static etc.
Oh it's becoming clear to me now,let me hypothesise.
A tactic that could be used by the double agent is to bombard the chat with a fake story until it becomes folklore, and then denounce anyone who questions that story. Brilliant!
For example,Fred & Ginger are a couple,Janet & John are another couple,so make up a story that Fred was seen having a liaison with Janet.Drip feed that story into the general population of the Chatbox.
Give the story details even though it didn't happen, you didn't see it, you have no pictorial or video evidence of it & more importantly, make sure that no-one else saw it.
If the story is repeated many,many,many times it will become fact. (internet laws see Trump,fake news,CNN etc etc)
This is where the double agent lures us into a trap. If anyone should challenge this story the double agent can be outraged that his superior intellect has been insulted by you the pleb,and obviously you are too stupid to understand the story in the first place.
Then the double agent will indignantly state that it's not his place to provide evidence of this story, and will then log out in a huff, thereby not having to provide any evidence,a win-win.
And should anyone suggest that this can't of happened because Fred & John might be brothers, or that Ginger & Janet might be sister's, (or whatever combination),the double agent can then play the Incest card.
The double agent issues accusations that the person( pleb) that suggested this are into Incest, or have a closeted interest in incest.
This will enrage the pleb enough that they will respond aggressively, because they are a pleb and don't know no any better.
The double agent now becomes the injured party and gets to log out in a huff again, another win-win.
For this to work successfully the agent needs to make sure that there are no Mods or Admin in the Chatbox in case they decide to intervene, thereby blowing the agents cover.

If anyone has any other theories on this subject,or has been affected by any part of this post, do feel free to join in, it is a forum after all, and we like to hear divergent viewpoints.

If anyone is so bent out of shape that they need a safe space or counseling, do not hesitate to contact me by PM in the strictest confidence.

Have a Nice Day

 

 

 

 

Brilliant!  Glad I'm not the only one who sees through this BS!

An RLC agent is just a figment of someones imagination.  If you say it enought times in chat it gets picked up and accepted as reality.

Who knows what happens outside the apartments?  All of the "facts" I see presented by some members is really theory and conjecture based, at best, on second hand information, then relentlessly flogged as the truth.  A prominent Nazi once said "If you tell a lie enough times, it becomes the truth".  For all we know, they may be hostesses at parties, where attractive women are paid to be present as "eye candy" for whomever is hosting the event.  Irma was a hostess for Alex the cell phone dude at some convention held in Barcelona, and I doubt that she's a technical expert on cell phone sales.  I'll also guess that she brought a lot of customers over to his booth. This is all assumtion, by the way.  Do you think that involved fucking prospective clients for his business?  

There are too many people in the chat room who state their opinions as fact, based on what they think might have happened off screen.  I only make comments on what I can see with my own two eyes, and if I have a theory, I state it as such.  Anything less than that is what we call "fake news".