eyenthesky

Who knows what happens outside the apartments? All of the "facts" I see presented by some members is really theory and conjecture based, at best, on second hand information, then relentlessly flogged as the truth. A prominent Nazi once said "If you tell a lie enough times, it becomes the truth". For all we know, they may be hostesses at parties, where attractive women are paid to be present as "eye candy" for whomever is hosting the event. Irma was a hostess for Alex the cell phone dude at some convention held in Barcelona, and I doubt that she's a technical expert on cell phone sales. I'll also guess that she brought a lot of customers over to his booth. This is all assumtion, by the way. Do you think that involved fucking prospective clients for his business? There are too many people in the chat room who state their opinions as fact, based on what they think might have happened off screen. I only make comments on what I can see with my own two eyes, and if I have a theory, I state it as such. Anything less than that is what we call "fake news".

better translationsoftare might be the fix. I use Babylon, and it does a very good job translating from Spanish to English, based on some of the comments that re posted in Spanish.

Iloner, I stand by my words. Moral high ground aside, as a paying customer of a subscription web sevice, I have the right to complain when the service I requested is not being provided, whether or not others may agree with my standards. That right comes with every monthly subscription payment I make. Further, in my second paragraph, I also informed RLC that possible legal repercussions could soon follow if they let the events at the apartment continue. Neither of those two reasons has anything to do with morality.

Please review the camera feed from the evening of the 20th. for possible events of assault and noq-consenual sex. There were several instances at a party ther there where five men in the apartment tried to force themselves on the ladies attending. There were multiple occasions where the girls said no to sexual advances from the men and were rebuffed, and some instances where the free movement of girls in the apartment was restricted by the same men. Further, all of the girls appeared to be intoxicated and at times unaware of what was happening, or powerless to stop them. This theme has been a constant at this apartment since it’s inception, and I do not believe it is the kind of content that either RLC or their customers desire to be presented. An apartment advertised as occupied by two ladies has in fact been inhabited by a pack of at least five unruly drunken adolescent boys. Please consider evicting the current occupants before more serious incidents occur, with possibly serious criminal charges attached to them.

so much for Masha being happy with her tit size, eh?

you're killing me! Love your sarcastic wit.

Latest e-mail from RLC - 09MAR17 Recent news: Belle has returned to the project Danaya has left the project Angelina is on a short vacation now. She'll come back on March 13th In the past 7 days the video from Angelina, Gina and Belle's apartment has been streaming in 1080p. We are sorry for some camera tuning experiments in the active apartment and for the inconvenience this caused. During that period we received many detailed comments and reports that will help us afterwards provide higher broadcasting quality from this apartment and all the others. At the moment the streaming is restored to 720p We appreciate your reports about the issue of the second camera in the living room of Irma, Lia, Mia and Stella's apartment. This camera will be replaced within the next few days. The apartment will be under maintenance for a short while at the time of the minimal activity The space between the Fullscreen and Replay buttons has been expanded to avoid accidental clicks. Thank you for the suggestions If you notice issues with cameras anywhere in the apartments, please email us at [email protected] More updates are coming. Stay tuned!

My 2 cents - Nicole has been a inconsiderate selfish spoiled brat since the day she came into B1. She couldn't get along with the girls there, and lobbied to get moved to B2. She was turned down, so she sweetened the deal for RLC by saying she could get a friend involved in the project at no extra charge, as long as she could get the big room in B2 to accommodate two people. I think she rather expected Estelle to vacate the room whenever she wanted to entertain one of her fuckbuddies, and in general treated Estelle like an unwanted stepchild. Her inconsiderate behavior by itself alienated her roommates, both at B1 and B2, and unfortunately I think Estelle was considered guilty by association. At some point Estelle stood up for herself, and that's when the trouble began. How many times did you see Nicole take Estelle out with her when she left the apartment? Only a few, because all the other times, she was out with one of her boy toys and didn't want the extra baggage. Estelle may not be the prettiest girl in the world, and she may not even have the right personality for this type of lifestyle, but unfortunately, we never got to find out because she was summoned to Barcelona under false pretenses by Nicole.

Exactly!!! I posted one composite shot of Irma before and after her nose job, and three days later I was banned. Either that, or someone whom I allowed access to my dropbox gallery posted content they pulled and I got caught out. Be careful who you give stuff to!

Not sure, but this was back before they offered replay for pay. Also, perhaps customer support doesn't have access to the review function. Nevertheless I was impressed that they responded and actually seemed to be trying to resolve the issue.

I've had this issue before with RLC. When I e-mailed them about the drug use that was going on in B2 about two months ago, they replied back and asked if I had any stills or video. I said no, because recording images was against thier terms of use (like we NEVER capture screencaps). They replied back that submitting images that supported suspected illegal activities was permissible and the only people that saw them was customer support. Bottom Line: you'll only get in trouble if you post RLC images onto open internet sites. I think that is one of the reasons you have to pat to have access to the galleries.

well, it's not seeing sex or not that concerns me. It's having tenants that should understand they are, in fact performing for us, albeit doing their daily routine. I have no problem with a majority of the apartments and tenants, either - if I don't enjoy them, I don't watch them. It's the girls that are abusing their contract with us and RLC by doing nothing for the majority of the day except sit in isolation in their rooms on their computers, obviously entertaining someone else on our dime, or hide their activities by going into unmonitored rooms for extended lenths of time. To me, that's not "real life"

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona. As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media. This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system. Another example is “Rebecca” Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities. she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project. These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers. I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in my opinion. I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

Iloner, you bring up some good points. I think they have a legal obligation to prohibit illegal practices, such as drug usage on their site. That not only protects them, but also protects their members. I would be afraid of being an accessory to a crime merely by the fact that I'm viewing it. If legal action against RLC ever became necessary, who's to say thier membership list wouldn't see the light of day in a public forum? I also believe they have a moral obligation to protect the health and well-being of the occupants of the apartments. Alcohol may be a legal substance, but alcohol abuse (and in this case I'm thinking of Lima) needs to be monitored and steps taken to intervene if it becomes too excessive. Who gets to make those judgements? I think we as viewers can contribute our concerns, and if RLC cares to, they can follow up on them. Ultimately, its their site, but we get to vote with our pocketbooks. In a perfect world, they would treat their subscribers more like stockholders, and be more responsive to our concerns, not just about incidents like we've seen, but also about other issues, such as the lack of cameras on the balcony, guests who abuse the privilege and become semi-permanent residents, or residents that have extended absences (Kami, for example). Their attention to our feedback would go a long way to cementing customer loyalty. As viewers, I think we also have a responsibility to moderate our expectations. We think every girl that comes onto this site must engage in a lesbian show the minute she unpacks. We get upset if one of them doesn't masturbate at least once a day... folks, it's supposed to be Real Life, and I'd rather watch a semblance of that than a choreographed lesbian party any day!

Maybe not. I sent an e-mai to them concerning the drug use, they replied back asking if I had any screen captures of the activity because they were investigating. I replied that i did not, in keeping with their stated policy of no reproductions of the site content. Perhaps they are listening.

The thing I like best about Adriana is that intangible sense that she "occupies the space she's in". Arms and legs all akimbo, she takes up 3/4 of the bed, all of the couch, and if she ever got on a dance floor, ashe would clear it out in minutes. It's the fact that she's not even conscious of it that I like the best. Plus shes TAAAALL!

Yes, at least the chat box. I used to be able to catch up on a whole day of missed activity. Now you have to use the load more button to go back in time.

And now that it's all played out, we see the result - Megan and Rebecca, two of the more popular girls on RLC, gone under Lolas stewardship. At this point in time, I won't be unhappy to see her and Polya both leave.

I think the last time I saw them,. It started in the kitchen, went to the den, then doggy at each window, on to the couch, then back to the kitchen. The camera switching was constant! Then one time they she was flitting about the living room naked and Bogdan dropped his pants and stood up. She grabbed his dick and towed him into the bedroom, giggling all the way!

It's been about four days now and the apartment still isn't showing. Maybe they decided to cut their losses, or maybe it just needs that much time for a good cleaning.

3 minutes masterbation before she got ready to go out with him, 6 hours of him waiting to show up, two hours of fending him off in bed, 3 minutes of clothed doggy sex mostly hidden by the bedcovers, sleep till morning. Rinse and repeat at a future date.

Judging by the size of his dick as seen in the shower, he doesn't have the range to be doing any flying other than short hops off the ground.

Massive hangover this morning. Lola can't hang with the younger girls.

abarut, it's a problem with CCBill and the site. I had the same problem a couple of weeks ago . The Forum admins supposedly took the issue up with CCBill, but I haven't tried to sign up since then, because I occasionally still see posts from people like yourself that tells me the problem still exists.