Jump to content
Create New...

ed2

Members
  • Posts

    379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ed2

  1. On 5/16/2020 at 12:02 AM, dave0000 said:

    Is she Italian? I heard her talking to someone on the phone and it wasn't in Russian.

    No, but I think she has an Italian boyfriend, and she speaks Italian with him. Same with Elettra (and earlier Piper), they are Russian, but speak Italian fluently with their partners.

    Elettra's boyfriend is Italian, and Taylor was Italian.

  2. Thanks! This might not be a bad thing, as this site has been slowly dying for a long time, and has badly needed some renewal or sort of kick-start. There are some obvious issues that need to be adressed. The most important being to maybe have a moderator that can be somewhat present. We need someone who can be present in chat sometimes, to just lead a good example, encurage, and try to prevent that it is only one or two strong voices completely dominate everything.

  3. 4 hours ago, RUBBERMAN said:

    I don't think that Gina has any haters....."maybe those that don't want any thing said about her in a negative way" and may be those who are concerned about her health in a positive way.  Gina is sexy and has good views when it comes to parties..."but tend to drunk to much and really doesn't have a limit"  surly her room mates know that, but people like Stella and Jaya her drinking coaches pushes her to drink more and end of making her look bad for the viewers...."at least the ones who care."  Maybe Gina who reads our comments well understand more better, then waking up after a night of hard drinking with a bad attitude towards the cams and bad comments.8)

    Oh, I have no problem with saying some negative things about Gina too, or any other tenants for that matter. I just think different viewers like different things. I love the wild, "too drunk" and sometimes embarrassing side of Gina. That's life, that's being human! The all perfect, and everything in control-people are basically just very boring.

  4. On 3/1/2019 at 1:58 PM, vampire said:

    A lot of Gina haters out there.  Funny cause you seem to watch every thing she has done in the past.  I have seen a newer gina--Yes she still likes to have fun-- she is a lot more controlled now--And is still hot as hell--Do you people even remember when you  were her age--  Dam--Maybe you should grow up .---She will eventually ,  And be boring like us .--

     

    Atlwast she is fun wathing then. I love the wild, unpredictable and drunken Gina, like we've seen her when she has been with Stella and Kylie. Jaya also has the potencial to be that wild influence on her. Gina was fun during the mid part of her first stay, her whole second stay, and the first half of this stay was great. But as long as the twins are there, Gina just becomes the third tripplet, and we get nothing but childish giggling and something that look like a parody on a preformance art show every other night.

  5. I watched Gina all night yesterday, and couldn't help noticing, she went to the toilet at 22:45, 23:00, 23:15, 23:28, 23:44, 23:58, 00:10, 00:20, 00:30, and 01:03. I know she drinks alot of water, but that can't be quite normal? Atleast I kind of understand alittle better now, how that 'incident' the other night could even happen, when she legit pissed her jeans going home from B3! That must've happened sometime close before 21:33, it took her 13 minutes from B3 to B1, the last time she went to the toilet in B3 was 21:05, but in this time Gina still managed to pee herself. That is kind of impressive though! Isn't it?

    That isn't the first time Gina peed herself on RLC either. She has done it maybe 3 times before! It happened twice on her 1st stay, once was when she came home in the evening, after being out clubbing for 20 hours, with a decent wet stain on the crotch of her dress, the other time was when she wet her bed in the middle of the night. On her 2nd stay, she might have peed herself during a very drunken party in B2, where she also puked all over her bedroom floor, because she came out of the toilet with a wet crotch, but it might have been just from not wiping. Also on her 2nd stay, she once woke up in the morning, the toilet was occupied, and she peed in a cup in her room.

    And actually, for the record, she is not the only one it has happened to on RLC. Rose peed herself twice, Lily did it once, and Adriana(&Daniel) once. And that is just the ones I've been lucky enough to accidentally catch, during my 2 years on here. I'm just waiting for it to happen to Nelly, as she always seem to end up desperate to pee.

    Sorry if I sound obsessed. This is somewhat of a "special interest" for me, catching something embarrassing like that, like a girl peeing herself. I think this is a kind of thing, with so many people, over many years, in a way ought to have happened a few times, but it is also a kind of thing, if it is very quick and subtile like that, almost no one will notice, or pay attention. But my eyes are always on the look out for such.

  6. Now I kind of wish that Martina & Alberto would get the Desiree & Raul-apartment instead. If they had upgraded the cams, the setup wasn't too bad. I think Martina & Alberto are a pretty great couple, that deserves something better. They have one of the poorest apartments on RLC, actually, if I judge by interior, furniture, and cam-angles too, I think it might be THE poorest apartment on RLC, even worse than Maya's.

  7. 4 hours ago, Plank said:

    I am a Hero member because I made 30 'meaningful' posts and was promoted from a basic member to Hero.Not my fault,it was the way it was.

    The the thing I said about BTR was an over-exaggeration, to try make a point, but it came out very wrong, and it was dissrespectful and wrong of me to do that, I'm cincerly sorry.

    I say nothing wrong about the Hero members, they are (mostly) great people. I even like the principal behind the Hero membership, those who got it had earned it by contributing to the forum, it's a nice idea! But did no one get my point at all? In 2016 it was made impossible for anyone new to achieve the Hero membership, it was "locked down", only those who already were Hero got to keep their status. I have over 30 liked posts too, and hypotethical, a guy who joined after 2016 could have 1000 liked posts, he would still have to pay for his access to the galleries. That's what I'm talking about, that is what is so unfair!

    So, I'm criticicing the system, not the people.

  8. 48 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

    That's a decision Admin will have to make.  At the Present Time the only thing Hero Members have access to is the Gallery & Download Tabs in the Menu Board at the Top of the Page.  They have always had Access to those areas.    The Paid Member Boards are not Part of the Gallery as they are on a Separate Part of the System.

    You still avoid my initial issue! You haven't given any form of explanation on why this decission was made like this, on what I see as the main unfairness:

    On 11/19/2018 at 1:36 AM, ed2 said:

    Then back to the part no one has explained to me. Maybe @Admin can answer? When the decition was made to "lock" the Hero memberships, why was it decided that all those who already had a Hero membership should be allowed to keep their status? For seemingly for all future? Why weren't all the Hero members turned back into regular black members? I can imagine that would have caused abit of an uproar amongst some of the older members, was that what you were trying to avoid? But I guess you never concidered how unfair this sollution would be to the post-2016 members? In principal, and in practice, this sollution meant that it is mostly the post-2016 members who pays for the upkeep of this site, with its galleries and evrything, and we will have to pay for our access for all future, just so the pre-2016 Hero members can access it for free, indeffinately.

    On 11/17/2018 at 4:18 PM, ed2 said:

    I think most of us understand that the galleries had to be taken down, and that you had to try and find new sollutions. And creating a Paid Members Area is a totally legit solution, hadn't it been for the dilema with the Hero members. My critique was of the Hero membership in itself. Why did you decide to ditch it back in 2016? And why on earth were the old Hero members allowed to keep their status? It sounded like a really stupid decition, and that is the sourse of your dilema now. And I repeate: Either you should've kept the Hero memberships achievable to all members, also those who joined after 2016, or you should abandon it entirely, not keep it in this sort of half way possition! That is just unfair to everyone! (Also to the Hero members, who were promissed that they would be able to keep their status).

  9. 1 hour ago, iloner said:

     

    Johnny also said: Question is who is more boring, the tenants or the people watching them!! (Some even stupid enough to pay for it) 

    But if some of us were not willing to pay for Johnny's pleasure in calling us stupid there would be no site for him to abuse us on.

    Those of us who do pay perhaps have more appreciation of what is on offer and the effort that goes into it.     

    Though sometimes mindless abusive immature postings are fun, and we would miss them.     But even without their inanities RLCF is a bargain.   The original complaint was about unfairness.   My view: make everyone pay.

    BTR had some succinct phrases;   WHINGEING FREELOADERS comes to mind.

     

     

    Exactly! I agree!

  10. On 11/17/2018 at 4:39 AM, Bandit said:

    Bad enough the chat has become a laughing stock, some of you want to remove the Hero members. Most of the members that keep this forum entertaining and worth visiting are Hero members. FYI was nothing to do with being friends with B.T.R. :ph34r:

    I have nothing against the Hero members, there are alot of great, and some less great people amongst the Hero members too, just like everyone else. My critique is solely about the membership policy. I could go on a rant about the Free members too.

    I know you belong to the growing group of members that are very disspleased of what the chatbox has become. A thing I have noticed, and that kind of bothers me, is that some of the very most active users on this site are Free members, and I think most of these guys only come here to use the chatbox, they don't really care about anything else on the forum. Just brainstorming, but maybe the chatbox is a feature that could've been made Premium, so that only Hero/Paid members could write on there.

    But anyway, wether we are Hero or Paid members, it has become a fact, that since the galleries were taken down, it is very little difference between us and the Free members. There is not much I can do now, that I couldn't do as a Fre member too. It is very few advatages with being Premium anymore. I have been a Paid member for 2 years now. My sub runs out in a couple of days, and I'm in some serious doubt about wether I should renew or not.

  11. 10 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

    RLCF stopped accepting any further Hero Members because at the time there was 1037 Hero Members.  Then after the Servers got taken Offline the decision was made to start reducing the Number of Hero Members which was done by an Account Inactivity Process. No others will be Removed at the present time. We didn't want to reduce the number but we were left without a choice.  If at sometime the current situation improves where our Objective is Obtained then we can add some of the Hero Members back in. At the present time that's just not physically possible.

    I hope this explains it better.

    Well, if I add what you told me last year, you have partly answered my question. If I understood it correctly, the number of Hero members were getting too high. People would just become Hero members, and there were too few Paid members to actually pay for the upkeep of the site. The site were in danger of getting closed. By "locking" the Hero memberships, you ensured that more of the growth in memberships would come in the form of Paid members.

    Then back to the part no one has explained to me. Maybe @Admin can answer? When the decition was made to "lock" the Hero memberships, why was it decided that all those who already had a Hero membership should be allowed to keep their status? For seemingly for all future? Why weren't all the Hero members turned back into regular black members? I can imagine that would have caused abit of an uproar amongst some of the older members, was that what you were trying to avoid? But I guess you never concidered how unfair this sollution would be to the post-2016 members? In principal, and in practice, this sollution meant that it is mostly the post-2016 members who pays for the upkeep of this site, with its galleries and evrything, and we will have to pay for our access for all future, just so the pre-2016 Hero members can access it for free, indeffinately.

  12. 8 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

    As most can remember what happened in July 2017 when the RLCF and Cam Caps Servers got Shutdown a lot of extensive work has had to be put in to come up with a Viable Solution to move the Forums Forward in the best manner possible. I have tried many different variables over the last several Months and the only way that would work was to make the Paid Member Only Boards. I myself would love to have the Hero Membership participate as well in those Boards as well but under the current situation and circumstances it's just not physically possible to do so at the present time.

    You didn't really answer to my post.

    I think most of us understand that the galleries had to be taken down, and that you had to try and find new sollutions. And creating a Paid Members Area is a totally legit solution, hadn't it been for the dilema with the Hero members. My critique was of the Hero membership in itself. Why did you decide to ditch it back in 2016? And why on earth were the old Hero members allowed to keep their status? It sounded like a really stupid decition, and that is the sourse of your dilema now. And I repeate: Either you should've kept the Hero memberships achievable to all members, also those who joined after 2016, or you should abandon it entirely, not keep it in this sort of half way possition! That is just unfair to everyone! (Also to the Hero members, who were promissed that they would be able to keep their status).

  13. On 10/5/2018 at 2:37 PM, CowArt said:

    Way back in the day (when the water was clean, and sex was dirty), there was no difference in features between being a Paid member or a Hero member. The only difference was the way the membership was obtained. You could purchase a membership for $12 and then you became "green", or make at least 30 posts in the forum and become "orange". Many of us oldtimers were also bumped up from "black" to "orange" on the chat by BTR. The only real difference I ever noticed between being Paid/Hero or a "normal" member was access to the gallery which back then was a real gold mine of pictures and videos.

    Since November 1st 2016 it was no longer possible to become a Hero member: https://reallifecamfan.com/forums/topic/2411-membership-policy-change/?tab=comments#comment-51360

    @Admin promised that "Current Hero members will retain access to the Gallery indefinitely". Clearly Admin has a different definition of "indefinitely" than I do, because on October 15th 2017, @StnCld316 issued a statement that from that day forward a Hero member that didn't log on for 30 days would lose his Hero status: https://reallifecamfan.com/forums/topic/3163-all-hero-memberships/?tab=comments#comment-68244. From then taking a long vacation was enough to make you lose your Hero status.

    Today I noticed that for every RLC apartment a "Paid members only" section has been added, that is not accessible to Hero members. So I would like to know:

    1. As of today, what exactly is the difference between being a "Member", a "Hero Member" or a "Paid Member" on this forum?
    2. Are the "old" Hero members such a burden on the forum's resources that they should be phased out? If so, why not just say and do so instead of first introducing an expiration date on "indefinitely" and now creating forum sections that are not accessible?
    3. Why wasn't there a topic created by the staff of this forum when the "Paid members only" were created? The whole point of creating these sections is in my opinion to sell memberships. Nothing wrong with that of course, but nobody's going to buy acces to these sections if they don't know they exist, or what can be expected to be found in them. From the title alone, I can't judge if I should spend my $12 on acces to the "Paid members only" section or on a couple of heavily overpriced coffees instead. 

    Well, we paying members ought to have some privilegies, in my not so humble opinion.

    Now I joined RLCF after these changes, and I can only see this system as totally fucked up! I did complain to @StnCld316 about this last year. How was this even thought through? No one can no longer become a Hero member, while the old Hero members were allowed to keep their status, seemingly for indefinate time. Let us say a member who made 30 posts like 5 years ago, or worse, just made friends with BTR on the chat, he/she will still have the same privilegies today, without having done anything, but I, as a post-Hero-member, can post 1000 posts on the forum, I will never get the same options without having to pay for it. How unfair isn't that?

    Either keep the Hero memberships achievable to all, or abandon it entirely!

  14. On 11/14/2018 at 9:25 PM, CowArt said:

    Green (paid) and orange (hero) members have the option to attach files to their post (upload them to the RLCF server):

    696808658_2018-11-1421_23_59-Window.png.598a98be8aa00aaac00ec2c17df761d6.png

    And it is no 146.48 MB limit here, like at CC.

×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search