tech help

[Harry1949]

That certainly is Irma in all her glory!  Thanks StnCld316.  That appears to have helped.  I am also trying to move a bunch of stuff off the computer which might assist as well.

[StnCld316]

On ‎6‎/‎13‎/‎2018 at 4:32 PM, Harry1949 said:

That certainly is Irma in all her glory!  Thanks StnCld316.  That appears to have helped.  I am also trying to move a bunch of stuff off the computer which might assist as well.

No Problem at all.

If you Post Images of any girl that's on RLC or has been on RLC Previously please use a Third Party Host as RLC will send a DMCA Request for it to be Removed regardless whether it's from their Site Directly or from another Source. They're still classified as a Tenant if they should happen to return at some point in time.

  is a Stable Image Host at the Present Time.

Thanks

[Plank]

5 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

 

If you Post Images of any girl that's on RLC or has been on RLC Previously please use a Third Party Host as RLC will send a DMCA Request for it to be Removed regardless whether it's from their Site Directly or from another Source. They're still classified as a Tenant if they should happen to return at some point in time.

 

 

Well that is bizarre to say the least!
RLC can not have any rights over past or future tenants ! That is bullshit !
They have rights to protect their 'property' such as images,streams etc, but there is no way they can have any rights over an ex tenant,like Irma,who may post pics on a totally separate site.
So how are these ex-tenants supposed to earn a living if RLC has that amount of control over them?
And if they do have that amount of control over ex-tenants, then that is very disturbing!
So what is this situation then in regard to K & K's alleged modelling work for instance?
What about those that do cam shows on MFC or Chaturbate etc? Do they own that copyright as well?
What about the pieces of music that Anabel plays? Or the music that might be played at a party?
They don't own that, and seeing as they are allowing it to be 'broadcast' on their site, they, by law should be paying the Performing Rights Fee's to the relevant people(s).(writer,artiste,musicians,publisher etc)
I'm sorry if this comes across as aggressive, but they really are taking the piss !

[StnCld316]

26 minutes ago, Plank said:

Well that is bizarre to say the least!
RLC can not have any rights over past or future tenants ! That is bullshit !
They have rights to protect their 'property' such as images,streams etc, but there is no way they can have any rights over an ex tenant,like Irma,who may post pics on a totally separate site.
So how are these ex-tenants supposed to earn a living if RLC has that amount of control over them?
And if they do have that amount of control over ex-tenants, then that is very disturbing!
So what is this situation then in regard to K & K's alleged modelling work for instance?
What about those that do cam shows on MFC or Chaturbate etc? Do they own that copyright as well?
What about the pieces of music that Anabel plays? Or the music that might be played at a party?
They don't own that, and seeing as they are allowing it to be 'broadcast' on their site, they, by law should be paying the Performing Rights Fee's to the relevant people(s).(writer,artiste,musicians,publisher etc)
I'm sorry if this comes across as aggressive, but they really are taking the piss !

I know they shouldn't have anything to do with Past Tenants posting of Pictures but they like to still intervene. So might as well keep the images on Third Party Hosts for RLC then we don't get their ridiculous DMCA Takedown Orders Even though the Image is of Irma but from another entity of her work RLC will still order a Takedown of the Image. They figure they own her even though she hasn't been with the RLC Project in well over a Year. Chances are she'll never be back on RLC since she has already had 4 Tours.

Edited June 15, 2018 by StnCld316