Real or a show

[Watcher43]

I know this is suppose to be real life, but I wonder if it isn't more imitation. Too many things are not real. Couples bang all the time, girls act all coy, and vacation people are really on vacation from everything. If it is imitation then of course there are no rules as it is entertainment. If it is real then it seems to apply to the fact that the cameras are hidden. The cameras are real. Intimacy is really rare. The girls apartments seem to be the most intimate, but seem to hold back allot. Rules maybe. Yet if as entertainment there should be nothing to hide. It is already rated adult. Allot relates to the calls on cellphones. Actions seem to be related the same way. Someone said about blankets being used. Privacy? Rules? Hey this is imitation not a life style. So girls should be themselves and guys should do the same. If it was really  real there might be second thoughts for certain things, but the project guides a certain way. Often without regard that few lives are going to be affected by their actions. One thing I have noticed is a certain jealousy that happens and then they move on. Who made jasmine boss? She should be a nun, and not on camera. Sofie and Monica are a natural progression, the hold up is the third wheel who isn't on the same wave length. In fact some of the matchups are equally the same. The replays are of little interest when there is nothing to see. So the project offers variety and yet so far it is getting very thin.

[dougiestyle4u]

Basically, it comes down to the cams. If the cameras were hidden without the tenants knowledge then you would more than likely see "real life" day to day action or living. Hidden cams are illegal and an invasion of privacy. So, the cameras are in full view and the tenants and guests are fully aware of them. Now whatever occurs in front of the cams is up to the voyeur site owners/management and the tenants. Agreed to rules, performance bonuses, if any, and tenant expectations determines what these tenants do or don't do. In the end, you will see a mix of everything - real life, scripted or fake shit, undercover sex, hiding from cams, do nothing tenants, somewhat normal tenants (very much debatable), ongoing story lines (Masha, Stasha and Dasha, for example), intentional sex acts directly in front of the free cams to entice new subscribers, cam girls or other unreal situations. A few apartments are close to being 100% real but as a total package of all the apartments then it becomes less real.

As a voyeur you have to decide if you want to pay for this type of voyeur cam arrangement. How can it possibly be 100% real life? To me, porn is more real than these voyeur sites because sex is real and you don't have to deal with the added games by the tenants or the fake crap they do to manipulate viewers. These voyeur sites are just like cam girls - try to get your money.

[iloner]

Great summary Dougiestyle.

It is noticeable just lately more and more girls are showing open pussy and bating.    I love it.  Maybe it is staged for bonuses or management demands, but I don't care.   Intimate moments with naked girls - what's not to like?

And just occasionally someone will do something unexpected, out of character, out of passion, and those moments stay with the viewer for years ................

 

[dougiestyle4u]

9 minutes ago, iloner said:

Great summary Dougiestyle.

It is noticeable just lately more and more girls are showing open pussy and bating.    I love it.  Maybe it is staged for bonuses or management demands, but I don't care.   Intimate moments with naked girls - what's not to like?

And just occasionally someone will do something unexpected, out of character, out of passion, and those moments stay with the viewer for years ................

 

Agree with your observations and I still find myself looking for that big tease even if it is fake or forced. A fake pretty girl is still a pretty girl and when a girl does something that gets my blood flowing then I have to watch it. Funny how a female can take advantage of our weaknesses - damn. Even Leora and Masha are predictable but so is my dick so it all goes hand in hand - lol.

[Max 2017]

Depends who you watch but let's be honest the whole "Real Life Cam" living their routine lives is bollocks. 

[iloner]

Got to agree Max

But then, you've got to watch the bollocks to see the pussies.

[Danny]

When money is involved don't think there is much some of them won't do. 

You want Real no point watching Girls on Vacation, Masha and her crew. 

[Shadow V]

None of it is Real if we're being honest but some are close as we are probably going to get. Personally pay and take the chance you might see what you are after or don't. But stop acting like little bitches and complaining when it doesn't go your way.

[Scotsman84]

On ‎16‎/‎02‎/‎2018 at 8:04 AM, dougiestyle4u said:

Basically, it comes down to the cams. If the cameras were hidden without the tenants knowledge then you would more than likely see "real life" day to day action or living. Hidden cams are illegal and an invasion of privacy. So, the cameras are in full view and the tenants and guests are fully aware of them. Now whatever occurs in front of the cams is up to the voyeur site owners/management and the tenants. Agreed to rules, performance bonuses, if any, and tenant expectations determines what these tenants do or don't do. In the end, you will see a mix of everything - real life, scripted or fake shit, undercover sex, hiding from cams, do nothing tenants, somewhat normal tenants (very much debatable), ongoing story lines (Masha, Stasha and Dasha, for example), intentional sex acts directly in front of the free cams to entice new subscribers, cam girls or other unreal situations. A few apartments are close to being 100% real but as a total package of all the apartments then it becomes less real.

As a voyeur you have to decide if you want to pay for this type of voyeur cam arrangement. How can it possibly be 100% real life? To me, porn is more real than these voyeur sites because sex is real and you don't have to deal with the added games by the tenants or the fake crap they do to manipulate viewers. These voyeur sites are just like cam girls - try to get your money.

Exactly. They should masturbate because they want to not because they feel they need to for what ever reason. Leora, Masha and Kitty might as well be on Chaturbate.

Watching people living their routine lives...... Whatever.

 

 

[iloner]

When Leora got her new apartment the deal was clear: daily bating on free cam to bring in the punters.    

There was even an obvious test run from her old aptmt to see whether she could and would bate full on camera.    She took a phone call, immediately bated, tossed her knickers in the air and the dog caught them and ran about sniffing them.    The cameras then were still a bit fuzzy - it has taken a long time for her to be comfortable as the porn star she now is.    Since Paul stopped moaning about her performances though I reckon she loves it.

The D/M/Sasha room is frankly a turn-off for me.   I guess others like it but it does seem like they are doing a job.

Kitty is barking!    But regularly she winks at the camera, or nudges the viewer with her eyes, or sticks her tongue out at us cheekily, and performs (tonight she pointed her arse at the camera and ran her fingers down her slit, then looked straight to cam much as to say - enjoy that?).    Sometimes she makes fun of bozo Smith.    

So yeah, Chaturbate - but they get to pick their own hours to perform and don't have to say thankyou to the viewer for tips.

 

 

 

 

[Shaggy]

Real or show discussion depends on who you watch:

You have:

The couples

Masha, Sasha, Dasha

Single Girls

Show Girls (All about the bonus)

 

[Plank]

It seems to me like a case of 'damned if you do, damned if you don't'.
If they masturbate or have a swingers session/orgy or whatever,the complaints start about them 'performing' and it's fake or staged or scripted & therefore not 'real-life'.
But as I said in another post,'sex sells', and that's what these sites & these tenants are there for,to make money.
We can recall the feeding frenzy's that have happened in the past,such as Masha & Sasha, Tk & Gf or Nina,Kira & DoeEyes.They all know what will drag in the punters so they can justify their salary or get a bonus.
If they do live 'normal' everyday lives the complaints ring out that they are boring or dull etc. Plus they won't earn much money for themselves, & they have the worry that if they are not 'paying their way' then the site will get rid of them.

 

[Capeguy]

10 hours ago, Plank said:

It seems to me like a case of 'damned if you do, damned if you don't'.
If they masturbate or have a swingers session/orgy or whatever,the complaints start about them 'performing' and it's fake or staged or scripted & therefore not 'real-life'.
But as I said in another post,'sex sells', and that's what these sites & these tenants are there for,to make money.
We can recall the feeding frenzy's that have happened in the past,such as Masha & Sasha, Tk & Gf or Nina,Kira & DoeEyes.They all know what will drag in the punters so they can justify their salary or get a bonus.
If they do live 'normal' everyday lives the complaints ring out that they are boring or dull etc. Plus they won't earn much money for themselves, & they have the worry that if they are not 'paying their way' then the site will get rid of them.

 

I think another issue is this: if the girls have their real bf in, like Jasmin is doing now, then you get complaints that the other girls have to stay dressed and will not walk around all naked. I personally think if you want 'real' then girls should have their bfs visit from time to time and get it on. That is the real world in a multi-roommate apartment; everyone has to give a little for it all to work. If the results were like Jasmin is doing now then I see no issue with it; but that will not be popular with the group who wants just the girls and never any bfs. 

[Plank]

12 hours ago, Capeguy said:

I think another issue is this: if the girls have their real bf in, like Jasmin is doing now, then you get complaints that the other girls have to stay dressed and will not walk around all naked. I personally think if you want 'real' then girls should have their bfs visit from time to time and get it on. That is the real world in a multi-roommate apartment; everyone has to give a little for it all to work. If the results were like Jasmin is doing now then I see no issue with it; but that will not be popular with the group who wants just the girls and never any bfs. 

And not to mention the dog's abuse that the boyfriends get from some quarters.

[King Hamlet]

8 hours ago, Plank said:

And not to mention the dog's abuse that the boyfriends get from some quarters.

Just jealous they have what they want so badly, quite sad actually.