eyenthesky

well, it's not seeing sex or not that concerns me.  It's having tenants that should understand they are, in fact performing for us, albeit doing their daily routine.  I have no problem with a majority of the apartments and tenants, either - if I don't enjoy them, I don't watch them.  It's the girls that are abusing their contract with us and RLC by doing nothing for the majority of the day except sit in isolation in their rooms on their computers, obviously entertaining someone else on our dime, or hide their activities by going into unmonitored rooms for extended lenths of time.  To me, that's not "real life"

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

I do not understand why you allow the behaviors of certain tenants in the two apartments in Barcelona.  As an example, “Milena” does nothing all day except sit in the corner of her room watching movies, talking and texting on the phone, and and video with a boyfriend in America. She occasionally will take her laptop into the room that has no cameras and not come out for twenty to thirty minutes. Recently she has been using a photographer to take pictures of herself and her roommates for publication in some form of on-line media.  This behavior makes me think that she is “gaming” your system.
  Another example is “Rebecca”  Right now at 1830 Barcelona time, she is running w web-cam blog, where she is going topless and massaging her breasts in front of the computer screen, which is also blocking our view of her activities.  she has exhibited this pattern of activity constantly since she has been back to the project.  These actions seem unacceptable to me, because she is using your site to generate personal income by running a live camera site that is directly competing with RLC and ia a slap in the face to your customers.   I realize that things happen in real life that are boring and mundane to the membership of RLC, but these two instances go beyond the bounds of “Real Life” in  my opinion.  I invite your staff to observe this activity and see if they agree with me, and if so, to please effect changes to the tenants.

Iloner, you bring up some good points.  I think they have a legal obligation to prohibit illegal practices, such as drug usage on their site.  That not only protects them, but also protects their members.  I would be afraid of being an accessory to a crime merely by the fact that I'm viewing it.  If legal action against RLC ever became necessary, who's to say thier membership list wouldn't see the light of day in a public forum?
I also believe they have a moral obligation to protect the health and well-being of the occupants of the apartments.  Alcohol may be a legal substance, but alcohol abuse (and in this case I'm thinking of Lima) needs to be monitored and steps taken to intervene if it becomes too excessive.  Who gets to make those judgements?  I think we as viewers can contribute our concerns, and if RLC cares to, they can follow up on them.  Ultimately, its their site, but we get to vote with our pocketbooks.
In a perfect world, they would treat their subscribers more like stockholders, and be more responsive to our concerns, not just about incidents like we've seen, but also about other issues, such as the lack of cameras on the balcony, guests who abuse the privilege and become semi-permanent residents, or residents that have extended absences (Kami, for example).  Their attention to our feedback would go a long way to cementing customer loyalty.
As viewers, I think we also have a responsibility to moderate our expectations.  We think every girl that comes onto this site must engage in a lesbian show the minute she unpacks.  We get upset if one of them doesn't masturbate at least once a day... folks, it's supposed to be Real Life, and I'd rather watch a semblance of that than a choreographed lesbian party any day!  

Iloner, you bring up some good points.  I think they have a legal obligation to prohibit illegal practices, such as drug usage on their site.  That not only protects them, but also protects their members.  I would be afraid of being an accessory to a crime merely by the fact that I'm viewing it.  If legal action against RLC ever became necessary, who's to say thier membership list wouldn't see the light of day in a public forum?
I also believe they have a moral obligation to protect the health and well-being of the occupants of the apartments.  Alcohol may be a legal substance, but alcohol abuse (and in this case I'm thinking of Lima) needs to be monitored and steps taken to intervene if it becomes too excessive.  Who gets to make those judgements?  I think we as viewers can contribute our concerns, and if RLC cares to, they can follow up on them.  Ultimately, its their site, but we get to vote with our pocketbooks.
In a perfect world, they would treat their subscribers more like stockholders, and be more responsive to our concerns, not just about incidents like we've seen, but also about other issues, such as the lack of cameras on the balcony, guests who abuse the privilege and become semi-permanent residents, or residents that have extended absences (Kami, for example).  Their attention to our feedback would go a long way to cementing customer loyalty.
As viewers, I think we also have a responsibility to moderate our expectations.  We think every girl that comes onto this site must engage in a lesbian show the minute she unpacks.  We get upset if one of them doesn't masturbate at least once a day... folks, it's supposed to be Real Life, and I'd rather watch a semblance of that than a choreographed lesbian party any day!  

Maybe not.  I sent an e-mai to them concerning the drug use, they replied back asking if I had any screen captures of the activity because they were investigating.  I replied that i did not, in keeping with their stated policy of no reproductions of the site content.  Perhaps they are listening.

Iloner, you bring up some good points.  I think they have a legal obligation to prohibit illegal practices, such as drug usage on their site.  That not only protects them, but also protects their members.  I would be afraid of being an accessory to a crime merely by the fact that I'm viewing it.  If legal action against RLC ever became necessary, who's to say thier membership list wouldn't see the light of day in a public forum?
I also believe they have a moral obligation to protect the health and well-being of the occupants of the apartments.  Alcohol may be a legal substance, but alcohol abuse (and in this case I'm thinking of Lima) needs to be monitored and steps taken to intervene if it becomes too excessive.  Who gets to make those judgements?  I think we as viewers can contribute our concerns, and if RLC cares to, they can follow up on them.  Ultimately, its their site, but we get to vote with our pocketbooks.
In a perfect world, they would treat their subscribers more like stockholders, and be more responsive to our concerns, not just about incidents like we've seen, but also about other issues, such as the lack of cameras on the balcony, guests who abuse the privilege and become semi-permanent residents, or residents that have extended absences (Kami, for example).  Their attention to our feedback would go a long way to cementing customer loyalty.
As viewers, I think we also have a responsibility to moderate our expectations.  We think every girl that comes onto this site must engage in a lesbian show the minute she unpacks.  We get upset if one of them doesn't masturbate at least once a day... folks, it's supposed to be Real Life, and I'd rather watch a semblance of that than a choreographed lesbian party any day!  

Iloner, you bring up some good points.  I think they have a legal obligation to prohibit illegal practices, such as drug usage on their site.  That not only protects them, but also protects their members.  I would be afraid of being an accessory to a crime merely by the fact that I'm viewing it.  If legal action against RLC ever became necessary, who's to say thier membership list wouldn't see the light of day in a public forum?
I also believe they have a moral obligation to protect the health and well-being of the occupants of the apartments.  Alcohol may be a legal substance, but alcohol abuse (and in this case I'm thinking of Lima) needs to be monitored and steps taken to intervene if it becomes too excessive.  Who gets to make those judgements?  I think we as viewers can contribute our concerns, and if RLC cares to, they can follow up on them.  Ultimately, its their site, but we get to vote with our pocketbooks.
In a perfect world, they would treat their subscribers more like stockholders, and be more responsive to our concerns, not just about incidents like we've seen, but also about other issues, such as the lack of cameras on the balcony, guests who abuse the privilege and become semi-permanent residents, or residents that have extended absences (Kami, for example).  Their attention to our feedback would go a long way to cementing customer loyalty.
As viewers, I think we also have a responsibility to moderate our expectations.  We think every girl that comes onto this site must engage in a lesbian show the minute she unpacks.  We get upset if one of them doesn't masturbate at least once a day... folks, it's supposed to be Real Life, and I'd rather watch a semblance of that than a choreographed lesbian party any day!  

Maybe not.  I sent an e-mai to them concerning the drug use, they replied back asking if I had any screen captures of the activity because they were investigating.  I replied that i did not, in keeping with their stated policy of no reproductions of the site content.  Perhaps they are listening.

Maybe not.  I sent an e-mai to them concerning the drug use, they replied back asking if I had any screen captures of the activity because they were investigating.  I replied that i did not, in keeping with their stated policy of no reproductions of the site content.  Perhaps they are listening.

Because if you say anything about RLC and drug use they will ban you just as if you post certain pics or vids  this new management is inten on running these girls into the ground for the world to see

side note we begged Rlc to make it better  more of this more of that now they are giving us their version of how they want things to be the only way to stop this is if we all cancel but you know that will never happen so the moral of the story is you get what you asked for like it or not
 

Another party went on at Madam Lola's house "AGAIN" it seems that the alcohol was not nearly enough for our so called unresistible wild ladies if you want to call them that,  some how drugs was seen "coke" in the bathroom and who knows what else on the patio "by me and other viewers" and that clearly hit the no go spot for me.  Now some of you may say leave the girls alone, let them have fun..etc!!  well what happen there tonight made these girls looked like they were 6 used (Derogatory) with no respect for them selfs,  I may get banned for what I am saying "and that might be ok too" but are we suppse to injoy these girls looking and acting like free meat all the time?  I was glad that I wasn't the only one who witness the durg use.  If Madam Lola is leaving, I don't think she really gives a shit anyway.  Question is "what and who well take her place" as the next queen bitch? I mean you have to be a real bitch to have control of these (Derogatory) "I mean ladies" Sorry for calling these stank ass bitches (Derogatory), they deserve better (Derogatory) I would also think these girls would need just another day of R & R time "rest and relaxation" instead of 2 days, because if it wasn't for that coke in the bathroom Belle wouldn't have never got her ass off that chair and started to dance around like she had a hot piece of coal up her ass.  I was up to seeing Stella and Carolina coked up but not the new girls. "dammmm!!!"

@football_king what you see is the realness Adriana is more real where as Leora is mostly fake. this make Adriana more attractive than Leora If ask the question which would you choose? most would take Leora. Ask again after about a month of living with Leora they would take Adriana 

Yes, at least the chat box.  I used to be able to catch up on a whole day of missed activity.  Now you have to use the load more button to go back in time.
 

And now that it's all played out, we see the result - Megan and Rebecca, two of the more popular girls on RLC, gone
under Lolas stewardship.  At this point in time, I won't be unhappy to see her and Polya both leave.

To me, it has nothing to do with the possibilities of whether or not someone is going to have sex with someone else.  I watch RLC for the naked ladies, of course, and the sex, but I get a lot of my enjoyment in seeing how  all of the girls interact with each other.  It's why Irma was such a popular girl -  she seemed to get along with everybody, and made her stay at Barca 1 with Ilona and Polya something to look forward to watching.  I think even Stella was moe outgoing when Irma was there.  I think each of the two apartments needs a leader - Irma was the one at Barca , but now the ship has no rudder.  For better or worse, as we've seen in the last couple of days with the bearded wonder, Lola is in charge at Barca 2.  If you swapped Irma for Lola, how do you think Rebeeca would act?
 

To me, it has nothing to do with the possibilities of whether or not someone is going to have sex with someone else.  I watch RLC for the naked ladies, of course, and the sex, but I get a lot of my enjoyment in seeing how  all of the girls interact with each other.  It's why Irma was such a popular girl -  she seemed to get along with everybody, and made her stay at Barca 1 with Ilona and Polya something to look forward to watching.  I think even Stella was moe outgoing when Irma was there.  I think each of the two apartments needs a leader - Irma was the one at Barca , but now the ship has no rudder.  For better or worse, as we've seen in the last couple of days with the bearded wonder, Lola is in charge at Barca 2.  If you swapped Irma for Lola, how do you think Rebeeca would act?
 

To see her naj=ked more often, you need to get rid of all the freeloading friends that sit around in their underwear smoking the hookah all day and night.  I still wonder why RLC tolerates the extra bodies in the apartments that do nothing to add to the experience.