Rhodie
-
Posts
324 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Competitions
Videos
Posts posted by Rhodie
-
-
19 minutes ago, sturmchaser said:
but I know asking this of some is like pissing into the wind, or farting in church, or asking Kira out on a date -
Farting against thunder? I am guilty of antagonising some people, sometimes intentionally, most times by accident. Don't give up on Kira. Perhaps, one day, she would like someone to take care of her needs? Nina doesn't. Never stop dreaming! I wish you luck.
-
4 hours ago, dougiestyle4u said:
Lately, I see comments being made about someone's post and then subsequent quotes are attached to the newer poster. Must remember to use the original poster's comments to reply to that specific topic of discussion. This happened in another topic of discussion elsewhere. This could lead to angry posters, including me, by being accused of something they supposedly said but didn't. Is the forum getting as bad as the chat room now? I think I said this about 2 weeks ago.
As you well know, I am guilty of that. You see a comment that you wish to reply to and go for it. Once again, my humble apologies.
-
I admire Serafina There is a misguided belief with us men that every woman secretly desires other women. The truth is, straight women have about the same desire to eat pussy as a straight man has to suck cock! Some fake it for the money and the views. Some, like Sera, don't.
-
On 2/26/2019 at 6:59 PM, Scorpio 22 said:
Excuse me!!
Wasn't me that said that. I am more switched on and mature than most of the members on this forum. Know exactly what happens on nights out and probably been on more in 2019 than most had hot dinners.
My apologies, I'm not sure what you're on about? I don't know how old you are and don't care. If anything, being an old timer would make you more inclined to agree with my views of life regarding our modern world. I don't hold your age against you in any way and have never doubted your mental capacities. Perhaps I am reading the "excuse me " incorrectly? If so, please tell me. I
-
7 hours ago, dougiestyle4u said:
What is this about? Never called ladies ho's. Getting obvious to me that chatters and forum commenters have a big problem understanding English or perhaps making assumptions/stories about members. Might have to say the fuck with RLCF and leave this site because people are getting just as bad as the chatters - FFS!!!!!!
My apologies. Nothing to do with you. There is a member who uses that name or something to that effect who refers to the ladies as whores and ho's. This disgusts me. When I was replying to your comment I saw what I thought was a link to him so I voiced me displeasure. It wasn't meant for you.
-
7 minutes ago, Clit Oris said:
Being a paying member doesn't give you the right to slander and accuse them of doing things you have no proof at all. You have proved that some think because the pay they can say and demand what they want.
Well said Mr/Mrs/Ms Clit. I agree with you 100%. Too many people here think that, because they pay, the participants owe them something? Too often I see on chat that, the ladies went out last night so now they owe us? Bullshit! The laws of defamation apply to RLFC as much as they do anywhere else. Many participants could make a lot of money going after those who have made false accusations? I hope they do!
-
On 2/21/2019 at 8:23 PM, dougiestyle4u said:
Yes, just like calling someone a slut or tramp. No need for it. The girls are nice enough to participate in RLC so why criticize any of their outside activities. If anything stick to criticizing their "performances" within the apartments.
There have been some comments that RLC is struggling to find new people? I don't know if this is true but, it wouldn't surprise me. I can't speak about CC as I seldom look there but RLCF has quite a few people who are very disparaging towards the participants. Sluts, tramps, ho's? If they get sexual, they're sluts, yet, if, like Sera, they don't get sexual, those very people are the same ones who call them boring and want them thrown out? I am sure RLC books the ladies (sorry Johnny) well in advance. That would give them plenty of time to see what RLC involves. I wonder if they warn them of RFLC and CC? Based on how RLFC has become, if I were one of those ladies offered a place, I would tell RLC to stick their Є2000 a month where the sun don't shine. It's not worth the abuse.
- ShaKa ZuLu Forum VJ
- I grew up in King Shaka's land. I know his history. I know that as a result of the abuse he and his mother, Nandi got, he was respectful of women. Your comments about the ladies, calling them ho's etc is contrary to the views of King Shaka. Your views insult his name.
-
23 hours ago, Scorpio 22 said:
The girls stay out late, some come back with bruises,
I'm not sure bruises can mean they had sex, if that is what you're implying? In my youth, after a night out, I often awoke the next day with bruises I couldn't explain. Most of the time, the one cause I could safely rule out, was sex!
-
4 hours ago, Johnny said:
Well on the girls (not ladies in my opinion) lets agree to disagree. As for Leora & Paul they are one of the most boring couples think I have ever seen and should have moved on years ago.
I use the term ladies more in the sense they are adults rather than girls, which would get us all locked up. I agree with L & P but, I doubt they will leave anytime soon of their own accord.
-
I don't want to get political but, I thought this was quite funny:
Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
- dougiestyle4u, Scotsman84, Wazzer and 1 other
-
4
-
12 hours ago, Johnny said:
The only thing that changes is the girls. You can read them like a book what is going to happen. Even one girl getting excluded and picked on by members is in the script ffs. There is no more change in the girls apartments than in the couples.
Fair point, but, with the Barca places, it's, sometimes, different ladies doing the same old shit which, in my opinion, is slightly better than the same old people doing the same old shit. When it comes to comments, what more can be said about those who have been there a long time that hasn't already been said a hundred times, especially for the likes of Leora and Paul who seem to live a very solitary existence. At least the likes of Tibor and Linda, Nelly and Bogdan etc. have parties to liven things up. As for the script about some members always finding someone to hate, it says more about them than anything else.
-
4 hours ago, dougiestyle4u said:
It is funny yet amazing how the constant talk about the girls actually gives them storylines and a life
Sad but true. Often the imagined stories are more interesting than what really happens. I think one of the reasons young girls are so boring is, their lives revolve around their bloody phones. Many try to make things entertaining but, what may seem fun to them, isn't always fun for us. Body painting, beer pong, etc. soon become quite tedious. Perhaps older ladies will have more imagination but, at least the girls try, sometimes.
- dougiestyle4u and PoeBoy
-
2
-
44 minutes ago, Dragnet said:
They are obviously going to be top most of the time, they are employed to perform and keep members paying and attract new members.
To an extent, you're right but I'm not so sure about your reasoning? I think the reason the Barca places get so much viewing is because they are the only places that change? Different ladies, different dynamics. It's quite funny watching Sera and Gina trying to coexist. Sera's birthday party was very awkward in that Gina was there and looked like she was wondering if she would be included? I am glad Gina did eventually get a piece of cake. The couples places tend to become a bit boring after a while? Some are fun as they have parties and invite friends over. Others, like Leora and Paul are like watching the grass grow. I think the Barca places are RLC's main attraction and will remain so. As some old bloke said, " Variety is the spice of life".
-
3 hours ago, iloner said:
Hi Rhodie;
I admire your balanced view here, and agree that sometimes girls are attacked without proper reason. Asking for evidence for a point of view usually gets no reply.
But our purpose is to be amusing, and none of us really know anything, and the girls have set themselves up to be commented on so are fair game, and sometimes in writing in a hurry the tone of what is said sounds harsher than what is meant.
From the final 2 sentences - what do they mean? - it seems you speak Russian. I understood from other comments that she had been overheard making arrangements for girls to escort so my understanding was that was the evidence. I have no problem with a girl escorting. Lucky men that get them. Enough girls have been seen coming and going from 'dates' over the years to make me pretty certain escorting is at least one of the ways in which some make large wads of cash.
Those of us who mean an insult by calling a girl an escort, or in reading the description assume that calling a girl an escort is disrespectful, have a more moral point of view than sits well on a viewer of voyeur porn.
Sera looks great and is a grown-up. Clearly she finds some of the other girls' party acts pretty silly. She doesn't want to show any sexual action herself, but needs to display something to keep viewers onside. So she encourages pretend actions with Mila or Ginger that come to nothing. Because they are a pretence designed to fool the viewer I think she is manipulative, of us and the girls.
If she had taken the pretence further and actually had some action with Ginger or Mila it would have been fake but I would have been fine with that. I want something to watch, not the pretence that sex acts are possible to keep us viewing when they are not.
Most of what goes on on RLC is fake. What we want is good fake. And just occasionally those rare moments of real
Just my view. I watch Sera sometimes. I would love to see her emotions involved, her defences overcome, if she would only let them be overcome.
Hello iloner. Sadly I don't speak Russian, only some Ukrainian. I wish I did speak Russian so I knew what the people on RLC were saying. What I said was basically imploring Rose to come back. I think her, Gina and the twins could be fun.
I agree the people have opened themselves to criticism by being on RLC but I feel sometimes it becomes relentless. Sera doesn't do herself any favours but I don't feel she deserves the endless criticism she gets from some? Much of it is based purely on speculation about what she does away from the cameras. Whether she is an escort or not doesn't bother me. What they do away from the apartments is none of my business.
I'm not sure I agree with you about her manipulating us? I think the fake stuff is more manipulative. Sera doesn't seem to be into that and isn't going to pretend to be just to satisfy us and get views. I can respect that. Fake or not, it's still fun to watch.
I too would like to see her relax a bit and become more open. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening at this late stage. A great shame.
-
19 minutes ago, Scotsman84 said:
The interest in it does go but you always keep an eye on it just in case something does happen you haven't seen before. 7yrs and still have a look every now and then but most of the time know I haven't missed what I've not seen thousand times before.
Occasionally something good happens but you have to wait a long time. That's the problem I have with RLC. Most of the time it's the same old shit but I keep subscribing because I don't want to miss that rare occasion something good happens.
-
42 minutes ago, dougiestyle4u said:
The Chat is a great feature and was well used much more in the past. We don't dislike the talk about the Barca apartments but the imaginary talk or personal info about the girls is uncalled for. Be a voyeur with your eyes - not the make believe shit in the head. Rhodie, we have no issue with you and it is nice that you see and realize the benefits of the Chat Room. Us older members enjoyed the chat room for what it was but not what it has become. Perhaps RLC put all the energy and money into the Barca apartments because of all the chat about them? The chat has become mainly exclusive to the Barca girls when it should be inclusive to anything. Some chatters are great but some only want to talk Barca.
I agree. I have only been a member for about two years so don't know the chat of old. In the time I've been here, it's been pretty much the same as it is now so, I know no different. That being said, lately it has become a lot more vitriolic. Still, I have seen quite a few new people joining in which can only be good. Love it/hate it, I strangely miss it when it's quiet? Then again, I am strange.
-
10 minutes ago, dougiestyle4u said:
Trump's wall - lol
Trump's imaginary wall. I think chat is a good feature and I look at it to see what I've missed while I've been at work or sleeping. These days it's mostly just "XYZ has left the building". I have thought many times about quitting RLC but, just when I'm about to do it, they bring on someone interesting. It's bloody annoying. I find I watch it less and less these days and just have it on in the background. For me, it has become a boring addiction. I'm a bit bored of it but don't want to quit in case I miss something good?
-
4 hours ago, Johnny said:
Yes I miss the laugh I get when I sign in and see what is being talked about. For someone that doesn't use it much, you do defend it a lot.
I'm not the chatty type. Like many, I dislike a lot of the shit said on chat but, I defend it because you can't blame all the chatters for the sins of a few.
-
A coundrom. Complain about the shit chatters talk yet miss them when they're silent?
-
I wonder if Serafina is the bad person she is portrayed to be? Some members just like somebody to hate, Neia, Mary, Rose etc. I remember how Regi and Sher were wrongly demonised during the spat between Theresa and Renata. Regi and Sher were good ladies caught up in the middle of something that wasn't their fault. Sera has been described, without any proof, as a sort of pimp? I don't know her history but, as a first-timer on RLC, I doubt she has the contacts for that? From what I've seen, she makes friends quickly, but then loses them just as fast? It's been a while since we saw Sara and Mila together? The reason for this, we do not know. I think it's a given that, like many others, you're not going to see anything sexual from Sera. As a viewer, shit! As a person, I admire her resilience but, perhaps RLC isn't for her. Розія, ваш час зараз. Джина і близнюки чекають.
-
Nick and Olivia were interesting because they were freaky as hell. Before them, I never knew butt plugs came with an assortment of tails? Tonight, I'd like to imagine a rabbit up your arse, tomorrow, it will be a fox that has climbed up there? As some have said, Nick is strange. He seems to be devoid of a personality? Well, who cares, it's thanks to them that we have Ulyana. I may be wrong but I think she's Olivia's sister.? She is a welcome addition. Nick, show us you're human!
-
-
1 hour ago, Scorpio 22 said:
Olivia and Nick great new addition RLC.
Judging by the apartment they got, I don't think RLC expects this reunion to last long? It has to be the crappiest place on RLC?
- Scorpio 22, Johnny and delta10
-
3
-
Nice to see Gina has made a good effort to welcome Ginger. As some have said, it's getting back to the good old days when newcomers were welcomed with a party and, those leaving had a farewell. I dislike seeing what has become the norm these days in the Barca places where nobody can be arsed to get out of bed to say goodbye to whomever is leaving. Serafina did her part in the welcoming, although, to me, the threesome on the sofa looked like there was someone off cam pointing a gun at them? Some are critical of old timers like Gina returning? I liked the way things in the Barca places used to be. There was little of this shit where people figured out how to get views with staged shows. Who better than those who were there in the good days to show the newbies the ropes? Many hung their hopes on Irma. Talk was she was paid a lot to come back? I don't know if that is true but, whatever the case, she didn't live up to expectations, at least, not mine. I have a lot of respect for Gina. There must be a lot of pressure to "get sexual" yet she never has. As I Gina fan, I wish she would but, at the same time, I admire her resilience.
prostitute or not ?
in Frustrations / Anger Board
Posted
I assume what happened was something dougiestyle4U commented on earlier? "Lately, I see comments being made about someone's post and then subsequent quotes are attached to the newer poster. Must remember to use the original poster's comments to reply to that specific topic of discussion. This happened in another topic of discussion elsewhere. This could lead to angry posters, including me, by being accused of something they supposedly said but didn't." I wasn't aware of this but, now that I am, I will be more careful in future. My apologies, it was unintentional.