Jump to content
Create New...

StnCld316

Forum Admin
  • Posts

    9,366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

Posts posted by StnCld316

  1. 1 hour ago, snk20183 said:

    If this makes Maya happy so what else can we say you know, huh....if Step ever got into a fight with this dude, who's gonna get their ass kick i wonder? ???

    Hard to say but it would likely be WW#3 Russian Style.   ;D

  2. On ‎2017‎-‎08‎-‎02 at 6:38 PM, Sam Cuddly said:

    See Invisible Watermark and How to Produce Invisible Digital Watermarking in Photoshop Without a Plug-in - Rossman Art for articles about how to use Photoshop to insert hidden messages into images and the messages can survive modifications of the images. Sure, they would not use Photoshop to watermark every image of the videos but they certainly could develop software that does it automatically.

    See Hidden digital watermarks in images - IEEE Xplore Document  for an abstract of a technical article about techniques to write software to  do it. If you don't know who IEEE is then just understand that most knowledgeable electronics experts are members and they are also software experts. See A Look at Photo Steganography, the Hiding of Secrets Inside Digital Images for a less technical article on the subject.

    So we must assume they can hide information in the images that we can't see or find and can't remove. It might be that not all that is true but we cannot be sure. One of the fundamental concepts of cryptography is to avoid letting others know what you can do.

    The Watermarks are only part of the Web Player that RLC uses on their Site. That's what produces the Watermarks. Behind that Web Player is a RAW Image. If you have the right Software it records the RAW Image of that Video Stream. You may see flashing dots and watermarks while watching what you record but when the recording is done watch the Video closely you won't see any watermarks or flashing dots. The only thing you see is the Clock in the Top Left Corner and the Sites Logo in the Bottom Right Corner and the Video created. Everything else is not present such as the 5 or 7 digit Code in the Bottom Left Corner of the Screen. That 5 or 7 Digit Code you get is on a Cookie that RLC deposits on your Computer or Device. A 5 Digit Code tells you are a Member of RLC when you are Logged into their Site. A 7 Digit Code is used by what RLC calls Freeloaders.

  3. 10 minutes ago, jabbath1987 said:

    I really hope we can post pics and vids as before in the sections of VH and VV at Camcaps. Its only the idiots from RLC making problems.  VH and VV understood these pictures are great marketing of their sites and will bring them members. Only RLC does not know and keep bitching around like in kindergarten....>:(

    Everything in the Forums can still be posted. The change that's going to made is RLC Related and does not affect the other Projects in the Forums.

  4. 2 hours ago, PeterGrey said:

    So what you're saying - use a 3rd party hosting-service for freecam images in forums?


    Any good tips? I've seen some posted earlier but some of them are old and "out of order".

    For the Pictures Members can use  http://keep4u.ru/  or  http://pichoster.net/  These two Sites seem to have a long life where the Picture should stay placed once it has been uploaded and posted.  The Keep4u.ru site has a box underneath the Picture once it has been uploaded. A checkmark must be placed in the box  Not Suitable for Family Viewing. If no check is in the box then they'll pull the Picture if it has anything to do with Nudity.  Pichoster.net does not have a box to put a checkmark in and the pictures seem to hold.  Then in the Embedded Codes Menu select BBCode Full then copy and paste the link.

    Like any Third Party Hosting Site there is always a chance they could receive a DMCA Removal Request for the Content that was uploaded to their Servers. If that happens then the Picture Uploaded to RLCF will just no longer appear.

    For Videos   https://new.myairbridge.com/eng/   is the best choice. The Video will only stay on their Servers for 48 Hours before they remove the Video File but it's certainly better than using  Zippy Share, SendVid or Mega  where videos get removed within 3 to 4 hours after they have been posted.  I always have an eye out for other sites for Third Party Video Hosts. If I find one that has a longer life for keeping the Video intact I'll pass the information along.

  5. 29 minutes ago, toolmaker123 said:

    That's why so much of RealLifeCam.com videos wind up on the TubeSites.

       RLC would have a very difficult time shutting one of them down, because of the amount of traffic they generate.

    Wait long enougn and all the video caps will make their way to an openly free downloadable site.

    And imagine being a player on rlc and  finding your nekkid ass out for all the world to see and nothing they can do to remove themselves. 

    RLC Videos are all over many tube sites. RLC has an impossible task at getting each and every one of them. Tube Sites also get DMCA Takedown Notices but most of them just remove the link change the name of the Title and place it back on the Server again. It's just a continuous circle.  I don't exactly know how much RLC pays the DMCA to Issue Removal Notices but the process is not cheap.  I always classify it as Free Advertising but RLC (Tech Fashions Inc.) just doesn't see it the same way.

  6. 13 minutes ago, CowArt said:

    Pictures in the gallery, administrators posting videos hosted on third party websites. RLCF has made up it's mind, the only way to keep traffic going is the public exchange of copyrighted material, and of course this game is all about page views and google rankings... Is there a way to backup a PM of have it sent to your email? I have a couple with ton if information in it I really would hate losing when the site gets taken down again.

    If a Third Party Host is used for uploading they have no reason to come after the Reallifecamfan Servers. The DMCA Takedown order will be issued to the Site where they Upload was done from.

  7. 1 hour ago, TBird97 said:

    Last night, two unknown males ended up at B2 to join  five girls celebrating something.  Lola, Anna, Nicole, Sofie and Helen from B1 ate, drank and had a good time. The two guys obviously thought they had died and gone to heaven with all that good looking pussy at their disposal......at least, so they thought. Helen left before 2:00 a.m.,Barca time.

    Eventually, the one male ended up with Nicole, who eventually took him to her room where she had unprotected sex with him. His performance was not stellar, by any means. Anticipation, fueled by booze plus an obvious hair trigger left Nicole less than satisfied. However, she seemed forgiving and understanding.He even got to spend the night.

    The other guy, referred to "Mr. Hat" by members here, tried his luck first with Sofie, who was slightly amused but obviously didn't like him. He then tried Lola, who wasn't interested either. Anna went to bed. Mr. Hat ended up on the couch by himself.

    Question: why would Nicole take the chance of having unprotected sex with someone she barely knew?

     

    Maybe by tomorrow she'll wake with that Burning Feeling.  Not very smart on her part having unprotected sex.  The guy only lasted about 3 Minutes but at least he got something.

×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search