iloner

After 2 sets of previous tenants (formerly psychotic Kitty) had had disputes with the neighbours my guess is RLC asked J & E to keep things quiet.
They did it so well most of us had forgotten the couple existed.
 

Hi Rhodie;
I admire your balanced view here, and agree that sometimes girls are attacked without proper reason.   Asking for evidence for a point of view usually gets no reply.
But our purpose is to be amusing, and none of us really know anything, and the girls have set themselves up to be commented on so are fair game, and sometimes in writing in a hurry the tone of what is said sounds harsher than what is meant.
From the final 2 sentences - what do they mean? - it seems you speak Russian.    I understood from other comments that she had been overheard making arrangements for girls to escort so my understanding was that was the evidence.   I have no problem with a girl escorting.    Lucky men that get them.    Enough girls have been seen coming and going from 'dates' over the years to make me pretty certain escorting is at least one of the ways in which some make large wads of cash.   
Those of us who mean an insult by calling a girl an escort,  or in reading the description assume that calling a girl an escort is disrespectful, have a more moral point of view than sits well on a viewer of voyeur porn.
Sera looks great and is a grown-up.   Clearly she finds some of the other girls' party acts pretty silly.    She doesn't want to show any sexual action herself, but needs to display something to keep viewers onside.   So she encourages pretend actions with Mila or Ginger that come to nothing.   Because they are a pretence designed to fool the viewer I think she is manipulative, of us and the girls.  
If she had taken the pretence further and actually had some action with Ginger or Mila it would have been fake but I would have been fine with that.    I want something to watch, not the pretence that sex acts are possible to keep us viewing when they are not. 
Most of what goes on on RLC is fake.    What we want is good fake.    And just occasionally those rare moments of real
Just my view.   I watch Sera sometimes.    I would love to see her emotions involved, her defences overcome, if she would only let them be overcome.
 
 
 
 
 

Hi Rhodie;
I admire your balanced view here, and agree that sometimes girls are attacked without proper reason.   Asking for evidence for a point of view usually gets no reply.
But our purpose is to be amusing, and none of us really know anything, and the girls have set themselves up to be commented on so are fair game, and sometimes in writing in a hurry the tone of what is said sounds harsher than what is meant.
From the final 2 sentences - what do they mean? - it seems you speak Russian.    I understood from other comments that she had been overheard making arrangements for girls to escort so my understanding was that was the evidence.   I have no problem with a girl escorting.    Lucky men that get them.    Enough girls have been seen coming and going from 'dates' over the years to make me pretty certain escorting is at least one of the ways in which some make large wads of cash.   
Those of us who mean an insult by calling a girl an escort,  or in reading the description assume that calling a girl an escort is disrespectful, have a more moral point of view than sits well on a viewer of voyeur porn.
Sera looks great and is a grown-up.   Clearly she finds some of the other girls' party acts pretty silly.    She doesn't want to show any sexual action herself, but needs to display something to keep viewers onside.   So she encourages pretend actions with Mila or Ginger that come to nothing.   Because they are a pretence designed to fool the viewer I think she is manipulative, of us and the girls.  
If she had taken the pretence further and actually had some action with Ginger or Mila it would have been fake but I would have been fine with that.    I want something to watch, not the pretence that sex acts are possible to keep us viewing when they are not. 
Most of what goes on on RLC is fake.    What we want is good fake.    And just occasionally those rare moments of real
Just my view.   I watch Sera sometimes.    I would love to see her emotions involved, her defences overcome, if she would only let them be overcome.
 
 
 
 
 

Good summing up.    I've seen Ginger and Gina chat together, but Gina has friendship only for the twins and Stella.
So Ginge is prey to Sera's schemes aimed at the Replay thumbnails.   Sera reminds me of Lola who also used to feed the girls to keep them onside.
At least there is a scheme.    And if Sera ever melted enough to need some sexual action I suspect Ginger would be happy to join in.   

Bang on.   Yes, sir.
BUT 'fake' is when you do something but it is not what it seems.    Actually they did nothing.
Last night, the brief placing of both girls' hands between each others' legs was all that happened.    This was what it seemed - a blatant attempt to provide a Replay thumbnail to entice the viewer to keep watching or to watch expensive Replay.
Rubberman has got the devious manipulative Sera bang on.    But I'm disappointed Ginger went along with her trick.
   

Thanks for the tip StnCld.
Some posters have been asking for greater variety of tenant - older, overweight.    I've still got my own teeth.
My application is on its way.

I did see this add posted on the internet probably about 4 years ago but never seen any Montreal apartments set up as a voyeur cam site such as RLC. I have been to Montreal many times over the last 12 years and will eventually move there. Montreal is quite liberal when it comes to sex. 
   As far as living in a free expenses paid apartment I think it will have to be considered an employee/employer relationship whereby the tenant would have to claim all the taxable benefits so the government receives the income tax revenue. Even certain "gifts" are taxable. Sure "under the table" deals happen all the time but if caught the penalties/fines and possible jail time are serious. The responsibilities and liabilities for both landlords and tenants must be taken serious as the government has strict rules/guidelines. After saying this, in terms of providing a free apartment to a willing tenant is possible or tenants allowing voyeur cams in their own house/apartment.
   Now, with respect to allowing cams in the apartment that broadcast over the internet - not sure about federal regulations that might not allow this but I am sure there are loopholes to get around this. Cam sites broadcast via the internet everywhere in the world now anyways. Could be privacy issues but if tenants sign agreements then it should be okay. No images of kids would be allowed. Notices of voyeur cams would have to be posted before entering the apartment but privacy regulations definitely have to be followed. As an adult porn site showing nudity and sex I don't believe it would be a problem unless the federal government requires specific licenses and high fees (similar to that required of adult bars and strip clubs).
     So if a homeowner or apartment tenant wishes to sign a contract to have their life observed by others via voyeur cams - really don't know why this hasn't happened yet in Canada (especially in Montreal, Quebec). There has been some 24/7 reality shows done but I don't believe any sex took place. What I've read is that the internet is not controlled by the CRTC (Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission) and people/ businesses are free to do what they wish as long as no criminal activity happens. They are okay with cam sites and 24/7 reality voyeur cams.
  Could come down to porn activity, any Canadian rights needed beforehand even if the company is foreign owned or just too many steps/obstacles/legalities and/or money required to get the ball rolling. Perhaps the RLC owners have a criminal record or bad reputation.
   Of note, Canada does have an abundance of beauties of all ages and nationalities so I would look forward to any Canadian apartments being opened up.
              As far as a specific answer as to what might prohibit RLC or any other voyeur cam site from setting up in Canada - sorry, don't know but there must be a valid reason but to me for a profitable money making company it should be doable.

With the latest recruits Olivia and Nick we seem to be approaching peak skank
Bondage and DP may be their daily life, but I somehow doubt it
RLC must be losing shedloads of subs cause theirs been more sexual activity inall rooms  the last 24 hours than last couple of months
Given the prolonged Nelly & Bogden absence, Im guessing shell be back with a pair of Kitty/Masha immovable seaside buckets on her chest, pity
 

I had a go at Chat this past week.
People were friendly and half an hour passed like the wind.   Mind you I like Barca as a topic, so I was happy.
In the past I abandoned Chat as too fast - I'm slow at typing and thinking.   Forum suited me better.
Some of the conversations are fascinating though - caught the tail end of one about the arrangements behind the Barca girls going to clubs and wished the guys would post on Forum so we could have an account that we could all read.
Does anyone use their phone to post - I have tried.   I can get RLCF but can't find where to log in to post?
I will have another go at Chat.   I'm more than happy to express an opinion on any topic - even the apmtmts I don't watch (I can explain why).
 

Not necessarily a problem.   Its a large barrel, containing some very nice bottoms!

Wherever Serafima goes laughter, fun and nakedness flee the room.
She's like one of those blue-light bug zappers in the butchers.     Hygienic for sure, but she saps the life out of the girls.      

Lets say average subber pays £1 a day and logs in 5 times a day (a guess - who knows?) and take the lower figure for visits of 167,000 and assume  3/4 were freeloaders who pay nothing this would be about £8,000 per day.     If any of these guesses are nearish RLC income would be about £3Million per year. 
Then add to that income from Expensive Replay.   PLUS it seems the same business owns other similar sites.    
When RLC was bought (was it 3 or 4 years ago?) BTR mentioned once on Chat he (his group?) had £half a million to invest.     AND it is clear a good proportion of income is being reinvested in improving the site (thanks RLC).    Nevertheless it is likely very profitable to run, though I expect 'security' is a headache.
These are just guesses for fun and interest - but it must be a great business to be in.  
 

With due respect I think that get together at B1 was more Gina's idea than Sera's. From what I've watched of her that just doesn't seem to be her thing. She only seems to have a very small circle of.. well.. acquaintances among the Barca girls and it gets smaller every day. I hesitate to call them friends, more like clients. Seems to be down to just Mila and Daisy right now. Also Gina and Leia are friends, they and the twins have been seen together on social media. There might even be a conflict between her and Gina for who really "runs" B1. Gina's RLC seniority gives her a sizable edge on that right now.

Not necessarily a problem.   Its a large barrel, containing some very nice bottoms!

Lets say average subber pays £1 a day and logs in 5 times a day (a guess - who knows?) and take the lower figure for visits of 167,000 and assume  3/4 were freeloaders who pay nothing this would be about £8,000 per day.     If any of these guesses are nearish RLC income would be about £3Million per year. 
Then add to that income from Expensive Replay.   PLUS it seems the same business owns other similar sites.    
When RLC was bought (was it 3 or 4 years ago?) BTR mentioned once on Chat he (his group?) had £half a million to invest.     AND it is clear a good proportion of income is being reinvested in improving the site (thanks RLC).    Nevertheless it is likely very profitable to run, though I expect 'security' is a headache.
These are just guesses for fun and interest - but it must be a great business to be in.  
 

Not necessarily a problem.   Its a large barrel, containing some very nice bottoms!

Nice to see that at heart you are a caring pussycat kind of a guy!
The visitor - they called him Ben when Jenn and Frank were trying to get him to stop being so aggressive - did get his fingers pretty much into Daisy's puss once or twice, and then she struggled her way out of him getting them right in.     BUT when they were rubbing her pussy and he was kissing her mouth I felt there were some parts of her that were not minding the attention!
I have phrased it very delicately - we all live in fear of the rabid feminist trashing our views (just to be clear, I'm NOT accusing Rubberman of Feminism).    Whether Daisy enjoyed it a bit, a lot, or not at all, she kept coming up for more, when she could have walked off.     So suggestions of Rape are over the top.    
Next night Ben's partner for the evening was Serafima and he behaved himself - mind you, her disapproving glances would stun an ox.   I guess its a rare man would be clean enough for her. 

I did catch Serafima's show tonight with Jenn and Frank...."I guess it was good of her to bring them over for a brief Christmas dinner"....I did expect a little more to happen after they give each other rub downs on the bed.  It looks like Serafima well be baby sitting these two from here on...."I kind of feel sorry for her, seeing that Jenn and Frank are more into younger things....I'd rather break wild horses then have the task that Serafirma has...at least I would know who kicked me in the ass.  I don't think making Frank walk around in his undies was necessary.....Maybe one day Jenn and Frank well catch on before its time for them to leave.

Whenever I can (family out of the way) I watch on my tv.    Near life-size, Karol lying naked on her bed in 1080p was stunning.
Porn has always been one of the drives of technical change.
 
 

Well I can't do this technical stuff posting clever pics, but thank you all those who do.
I'm hoping all of us enter the New Year waggy-tailed and chirpy.  
I love the girl-girl emphasis in Barca, but for those of you who don't there are even more ordinary apmts to watch.
This site has survived a difficult year - perhaps only just.    But there is much to enjoy, which gets reflected in humour -  even some of the negative posts have been fun.
Our Elsie has made an even better site for us over this year.   They're much maligned, but there is a lot they do right.
Thanks everyone.
 
 

Well I can't do this technical stuff posting clever pics, but thank you all those who do.
I'm hoping all of us enter the New Year waggy-tailed and chirpy.  
I love the girl-girl emphasis in Barca, but for those of you who don't there are even more ordinary apmts to watch.
This site has survived a difficult year - perhaps only just.    But there is much to enjoy, which gets reflected in humour -  even some of the negative posts have been fun.
Our Elsie has made an even better site for us over this year.   They're much maligned, but there is a lot they do right.
Thanks everyone.
 
 

Well I can't do this technical stuff posting clever pics, but thank you all those who do.
I'm hoping all of us enter the New Year waggy-tailed and chirpy.  
I love the girl-girl emphasis in Barca, but for those of you who don't there are even more ordinary apmts to watch.
This site has survived a difficult year - perhaps only just.    But there is much to enjoy, which gets reflected in humour -  even some of the negative posts have been fun.
Our Elsie has made an even better site for us over this year.   They're much maligned, but there is a lot they do right.
Thanks everyone.
 
 

Since it's not me, it must be you? Like you, I enjoyed having Ami back. I don't understand why some dislike her? For me she ticks all the boxes. Beautiful, willing to do stuff with males or females? What's not to like? Some question her morals? I'm not paying $45 a month to see nuns. Their personal situations are their business, not ours. 

I apologise for calling you an arsehole. We seldom agree, but, that was uncalled for. I would offer the excuse that I'd had a good night at the pub but that doesn't justify it. I should have said "you're being an arsehole". The difference being "you are an arsehole" suggests it's a permanent disposition whereas "you are being an arsehole" means you're not always one. I can't comment on your relationship with Iloner but, I have always  liked his opinion as he seems to see the positives in people rather than ignore them and point out the negatives. I doubt he's stalking you but merely offering a counter argument to your opinions. If you post something, expect criticism and comments from those who don't share those opinions. If you criticise somebody they like, of course they're going to defend them. Criticise Rose and I will be breaking down your front door tomorrow! Once again, my apologises, arsehole.

My assumption is that Rubberman means me.    Perhaps I am honoured he chooses to spill his bile on me, but why he does so I can't tell you.    He chose Amina to dump on and she has been high value good fun for us.    
And of course he knows perfectly well that his claim I follow him about is nonsense.   Wasting time refuting his claims would only delight him.
No one posts as much as he does, and much of it is perceptive and fun, but a lot is negative.   One or two posters appear to take their cue from his posts and also make up negative claims they cannot defend with observations.
I express on the General Discussion pages my view that all the negativity has spoiled the enjoyment of many posters who have just given up and left.      
But everyone should be free to post as they see fit.     My opinion is it gives him pleasure as a 'game' to irritate others and drown out voices other than his.    
Shame, because he has so much vitality to offer.    He spends so much time here he must value this site highly.     I guess he just does not recognise that his actions sometimes reduce the enjoyment of others.