gironimo

IMHO. Belle will be vacating B2 at the end of this month. All the nudity she is showing in the past two weeks is just to add to the 2000 Euros she  gets paid  monthly.  It's an act and nothing more. She was a lame duck last year and she hasn't changed much.

Took a lot of guts to return after the (mis)treatment of last time.
Perhaps understandably, the heart didn't seem to be in it quite the same as before and perhaps a few too many outside distractions, which seems to be standard with all of them these days but kudos to Stella for trying.
AND she's got a personality and tries to fit in, unlike another current returnee who I'm still trying to work out why she's back.
Stella is and always will be one of the best looking girls in all senses of the word that will ever appear in the RLC project.

I realise that this a contentious subject which caused a real furore the back end of last year and is still relevant now, judging by the amount that it is mentioned in current posts/comments, but I'm not sure what the problem is with the minor use of certain "additives" if it helps some people to come out of themselves temporarily.
I'm not advocating the use of drugs, never touched them myself - unless you count copious amounts of alcohol when I was younger or a forty a day tobacco habit - but, for a lot of people, drug use is part of real life.
A lot of people complain endlessly about the lack of "action" in the barca apartments recently and how the likes of Belle, Stella etc. haven't been the same the second time around. Lets not forget that they weren't much cop the first time around until those hot summer nights last year when chemical assistance was used. The same goes for Megan, Rebecca, caroline etc.
It was/is perfectly clear that none of them are addicts and its not as if they were giving a bad example to a young audience was it. 
Complain when they go out, complain when they stay in and do nothing. Complain that some of them smoke too much, complain that some of them drink to much. complain, when stuff does happen, that they must be taking something.
Too much analysing is bad for you.

I realise that this a contentious subject which caused a real furore the back end of last year and is still relevant now, judging by the amount that it is mentioned in current posts/comments, but I'm not sure what the problem is with the minor use of certain "additives" if it helps some people to come out of themselves temporarily.
I'm not advocating the use of drugs, never touched them myself - unless you count copious amounts of alcohol when I was younger or a forty a day tobacco habit - but, for a lot of people, drug use is part of real life.
A lot of people complain endlessly about the lack of "action" in the barca apartments recently and how the likes of Belle, Stella etc. haven't been the same the second time around. Lets not forget that they weren't much cop the first time around until those hot summer nights last year when chemical assistance was used. The same goes for Megan, Rebecca, caroline etc.
It was/is perfectly clear that none of them are addicts and its not as if they were giving a bad example to a young audience was it. 
Complain when they go out, complain when they stay in and do nothing. Complain that some of them smoke too much, complain that some of them drink to much. complain, when stuff does happen, that they must be taking something.
Too much analysing is bad for you.

Don't you mean " his "?!

I would rather hand over 2 pennies than offer my two cents worth of opinion - since the chatters are not worth trying to make ANY common sense or even argue with (especially with respect to the Barca apartments) - sheeesh!!!

A newly wed couple are in the hotel room and its the first time that they have seen each other naked.
The bloke says " bloody hell, what fantastic big tits you've got "
The woman says " how dare you " and pushes him out on the balcony stark bollock naked.
' shit', he thinks, then he looks across to the next balcony and there's another bloke stood there also naked.
" What happened to you? " he says.
Bloke number two says " I just said to my wife that she's got a lovely big arse, she threw a wobbly and kicked me out here.
With that, the door of the balcony on the other side bursts open and another naked bloke stumbles out.
" Blimey" says the first bloke, " I bet you put your foot in it as well "
" No " says the third bloke, " but I bloody could have done "
 

I think the point here is that this is mainly a chat box problem and I am quite lucky in that I only view the chat box to keep up with events during the day much the same as iloner, and the idiots are noticeable by their absence at that time. Some of the regular contributors are real characters and some of their comments make me laugh out loud ( in a good way ), Scotsman84, Plank and Reallifecamfan51 to name but three.
In the early hours ( here ), however, there are a number of regulars in the chatbox that really do make me wonder if I am watching the same thing as them. They seem intent on making the most distorted comments possible. Is it because they don't  pay to see what is actually going on? I don't know. Add to that another whose quest in life seems to be to find the ultimate in stupid questions and I am afraid that when any of these individuals announces their arrival in the chat box, I'm gone. Its the only way to stay sane.

Iloner,
As I stated in a different post, I'm not going to renew this month because a combination of restricted viewing time and currently not enough points of interest mean that it is money wasted at the present time.
I wasn't a member the first time that Danaya was present so I can't remember the times that you have described and I don't mean my comments to be derogatory towards Danaya because I thought that she was one of the more attractive girls even as she started to " expand ".
I will continue to log on to RLCF because, although I am not one for the chat box, I do enjoy posting in the forum although I think that, being new to this, I quite often sound more negative than I mean to be.
The other thing, of course, is that I will continue to receive emails from RLC as the current girls get replaced but they will just contain names and I will be relying on you guys to indicate whether we get some good - uns!

Got to say its not the first time that I haven't renewed through frustration.
Just to underline the current situation, Just logged on and we've got four girls lined up on the sofa in b1, just like the three ( un )wise monkeys and their mate and Belle and Rosemary asleep in b2 at 10.20pm their time.
Nine times out of ten, Lola, Megan and Amy did nothing more than sit on the sofa during their time, but at least they didn't keep disappearing. Amy didn't bate at all. Megan didn't until those wonderful nights towards the end of her stay and Lola did occasionally but very surreptitiously, described by somebody at the time as the first time they had watched a zombie bate!
Ilona bated but the camera angles at the time were bad. Polya openly bated and we all know about Irma. One of my top and probably everlasting memories is Lola sat on ( I think it was Caroline's ) face. Brilliant.
It wasn't entertainment every night but at least it felt like the RLC subscribers were being put first.
I'm sure that I will re-subscribe in the not too distant future like normal but most of the current crop will have to have moved on before that happens.

My subscription for RLC membership is done on a monthly basis because the novelty of the couples apartments wore off some time ago and the subscription renewal decision is, these days, based primarily on how entertaining the current occupants of the barca apartments are. On this basis, I have to give credit to the lords of RLC for managing to achieve the position of completely filling both b1 and b2 with a combination of " can't be bothereds " and  "won'ts " in ( almost ) equal numbers and, there fore, making the decision not to renew an easy one.
There's no point being selective - everybody to their own - but I only find one of the eight physically or facially attractive ( and she is one of the " can't be bothereds " ), so I don't care if there is any erotic interaction between them ( yeah, right! ) Its 01.36 Wednesday their time and there's only one girl in each apartment, which is a far too regular occurrence these days anyway.
Lots of comments about this in chat box and elsewhere recently, but the replacement girl scenario has become a bit of a conundrum.  Back when I joined, it was Lola, Megan and Amy  ( who never did anything but it didn't seem to matter back then ) in b2 and they never went out.  In b1 it was Ilona, Polya and Irma and they occasionally went out together and returned together. Now, being out more than in has become the norm. Belle and Stella whom came good ( as it were! ) last time around after slow starts are an integral part of this new regime and, of course, no new face is going to lead the rest in any other direction against what has become the standard circa Rosemary and Kylie.
In the case of Rosemary, if the people who know about these things were right in their claims that she is an integral part of the RLC girls recruiting setup then she needs to be given the boot by the RLC hierarchy forthwith.
Unfortunately, the twins leaving date, which can't be far away now, hasn't arrived quickly enough to beat my subscription renewal date and, in any case, with b1 now overflowing with deadwood, who's to say that their replacement isn't already there.
Don't know who leaves after that but there's only person who I think, in the short term, could serve to get at least one of the barcas back on track, its an old ( or should I say more mature ) face and the name has already appeared in this posting.
I wonder who that could be? ( A clue? It's not Irma )
 

My subscription for RLC membership is done on a monthly basis because the novelty of the couples apartments wore off some time ago and the subscription renewal decision is, these days, based primarily on how entertaining the current occupants of the barca apartments are. On this basis, I have to give credit to the lords of RLC for managing to achieve the position of completely filling both b1 and b2 with a combination of " can't be bothereds " and  "won'ts " in ( almost ) equal numbers and, there fore, making the decision not to renew an easy one.
There's no point being selective - everybody to their own - but I only find one of the eight physically or facially attractive ( and she is one of the " can't be bothereds " ), so I don't care if there is any erotic interaction between them ( yeah, right! ) Its 01.36 Wednesday their time and there's only one girl in each apartment, which is a far too regular occurrence these days anyway.
Lots of comments about this in chat box and elsewhere recently, but the replacement girl scenario has become a bit of a conundrum.  Back when I joined, it was Lola, Megan and Amy  ( who never did anything but it didn't seem to matter back then ) in b2 and they never went out.  In b1 it was Ilona, Polya and Irma and they occasionally went out together and returned together. Now, being out more than in has become the norm. Belle and Stella whom came good ( as it were! ) last time around after slow starts are an integral part of this new regime and, of course, no new face is going to lead the rest in any other direction against what has become the standard circa Rosemary and Kylie.
In the case of Rosemary, if the people who know about these things were right in their claims that she is an integral part of the RLC girls recruiting setup then she needs to be given the boot by the RLC hierarchy forthwith.
Unfortunately, the twins leaving date, which can't be far away now, hasn't arrived quickly enough to beat my subscription renewal date and, in any case, with b1 now overflowing with deadwood, who's to say that their replacement isn't already there.
Don't know who leaves after that but there's only person who I think, in the short term, could serve to get at least one of the barcas back on track, its an old ( or should I say more mature ) face and the name has already appeared in this posting.
I wonder who that could be? ( A clue? It's not Irma )
 

How much would you care about power usage if you weren't paying for it?
I think you will find that that is the difference between us and them and the answer to your question.
As for the sleeping arrangements of some, do you realise just how far it is from the lounge to the bedroom when they've done f**k all all day lol 

How much would you care about power usage if you weren't paying for it?
I think you will find that that is the difference between us and them and the answer to your question.
As for the sleeping arrangements of some, do you realise just how far it is from the lounge to the bedroom when they've done f**k all all day lol 

Thank you Iloner.
Each individuals opinion is of course going to be determined by their personal definition of the term " voyeur ".
I guess , on a site such as RCL, where we, as viewers, become long term voyeurs of the same people and maybe become inadvertently " attached "to some of them, it's human nature to want to learn a bit more about them. Its when it becomes an obsession that it becomes a problem.
In this day and age of social media, there is much to be freely accessed about many individuals. Some of the stuff posted, however, can only come from people identifying the movements of the tenants outside of the apartments which certainly isn't in the tenants interests. I'm sure that the girls are well protected when they go dancing or whatever else they do, but it's a fine line between observation and something more.
I still don't see how the understanding of conversations or the knowledge of situations outside the apartments relates to our enjoyment of the site or the project, which is supposedly based on observing people in their home environment. whatever aspects of said observation interest each individual viewer, it is only relative within the apartments.
I don't mean to be argumentative as I understand that everybody has their own approach, needs etc. These are just my views on this particular aspect of RCL and, as I said before, I am happy just to watch the participants when they are at home.

I have to say that since I ( fairly recently ) joined this forum, I have become confused as to what it is really all about.
The definition of a " voyeur " in relation of a site like RCL IS " a person who gains sexual pleasure from WATCHING others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity ". After visiting this forum a few times, however, it became apparent that there are a lot of people, primarily in the chat box who seem to know a lot more about some of the tenants, especially the barca tenants - past and present - than would seem healthy.
There are people who admit to running live conversations between tenants through multiple translating software and as Shaka says, people that physically attempt to decipher and translate conversations that have taken place. Why? Are microphones even necessary when the sounds from any ( rare these days ) sexual activity is normally drowned out by music anyway. There are people that say they know people that know where the girls go when they leave the apartments. Do they follow them around? Come on, really? Even the links to the outside lives of tenants as referred to in the quote in Planks post above don't have any place in voyeurism.
There has been a lot of conversation this evening in the chat box about Irma's replacement, who arrived today, with one person stating that the new girl is actual top dog in the RCL Russian girl production line. How do they know? Why do they know? and what's it got to do with them or anybody else anyway?
Not content just to watch and enjoy, some people clearly don't know the difference between voyeurism and stalking.
Makes me glad that I am 1100 miles away from barca and I can choose to do the only thing that any of us should be doing. Watch.

I have to say that since I ( fairly recently ) joined this forum, I have become confused as to what it is really all about.
The definition of a " voyeur " in relation of a site like RCL IS " a person who gains sexual pleasure from WATCHING others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity ". After visiting this forum a few times, however, it became apparent that there are a lot of people, primarily in the chat box who seem to know a lot more about some of the tenants, especially the barca tenants - past and present - than would seem healthy.
There are people who admit to running live conversations between tenants through multiple translating software and as Shaka says, people that physically attempt to decipher and translate conversations that have taken place. Why? Are microphones even necessary when the sounds from any ( rare these days ) sexual activity is normally drowned out by music anyway. There are people that say they know people that know where the girls go when they leave the apartments. Do they follow them around? Come on, really? Even the links to the outside lives of tenants as referred to in the quote in Planks post above don't have any place in voyeurism.
There has been a lot of conversation this evening in the chat box about Irma's replacement, who arrived today, with one person stating that the new girl is actual top dog in the RCL Russian girl production line. How do they know? Why do they know? and what's it got to do with them or anybody else anyway?
Not content just to watch and enjoy, some people clearly don't know the difference between voyeurism and stalking.
Makes me glad that I am 1100 miles away from barca and I can choose to do the only thing that any of us should be doing. Watch.

I have to say that since I ( fairly recently ) joined this forum, I have become confused as to what it is really all about.
The definition of a " voyeur " in relation of a site like RCL IS " a person who gains sexual pleasure from WATCHING others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity ". After visiting this forum a few times, however, it became apparent that there are a lot of people, primarily in the chat box who seem to know a lot more about some of the tenants, especially the barca tenants - past and present - than would seem healthy.
There are people who admit to running live conversations between tenants through multiple translating software and as Shaka says, people that physically attempt to decipher and translate conversations that have taken place. Why? Are microphones even necessary when the sounds from any ( rare these days ) sexual activity is normally drowned out by music anyway. There are people that say they know people that know where the girls go when they leave the apartments. Do they follow them around? Come on, really? Even the links to the outside lives of tenants as referred to in the quote in Planks post above don't have any place in voyeurism.
There has been a lot of conversation this evening in the chat box about Irma's replacement, who arrived today, with one person stating that the new girl is actual top dog in the RCL Russian girl production line. How do they know? Why do they know? and what's it got to do with them or anybody else anyway?
Not content just to watch and enjoy, some people clearly don't know the difference between voyeurism and stalking.
Makes me glad that I am 1100 miles away from barca and I can choose to do the only thing that any of us should be doing. Watch.

Take care Rob1.     Noticed that you have laid back quite a bit over the last few months and totally understand where you are coming from. I believe both RLC and RLCF have been in a downward spiral and can't see things getting any better. At times I feel like rejoining the chat but after I read any new chatter I decide not to. The chatbox isn't what it was. Now with other voyeur sites to look at and crappy RLC it makes it very difficult to continue with even RLCF. RLC has lost it's edge or formula or too slow to accept needed changes or even keep up to competitors.
  Totally agree with you about all the fake shit going on. It is so bad that I can't even watch IRMA anymore especially since I always thought she was one of the best for RLC. I tour the RLC apartments but very little interests me for my voyeuristic needs so I check out the other sites. The odd time when I am fortunate to catch Desiree, other than when she sleeps covered with a blanket or bundled up from head to toe with bulky clothes, I melt because she is so fucking hot (her wearing fishnet hooks me in every time).
   Just a thought - perhaps RLC Admin should set up a second CHATBOX for members with at least 1 to 2 years as a member of RLCF and based on stricter guidelines/decorum to adhere to. Also a probation period and warnings to the member to behave or booted out. It seems that RLCF is just like RLC - don't care about losing subscribers or members because there are always new people joining??? So much for RLCF being a family. As I mentioned or questioned previously, RLCF has almost 22,000 members but how many are actually still active. Also the substantial drop in the amount of pics/videos posted in the forums has impacted RLCF site quite a bit, in my opinion.
   One time I got shit by a relatively new member for posting a negative comment about a tenant in their fan page. Well, everyone posts negative comments in all the fan pages now. What's up with that?
   I will say that from my observations - I see new chatters get excited to participate in discussions but eventually they too get disheartened by RLC or they get fed up with the tone of the chatters and leave.
  I am confused by the chatters. They don't hesitate to say that RLC IS NOT a porn site but why the fuck do they keep demanding that the tenants have sex when they log in to RLC (masturbation, lesbian trysts, threesome, foursome, orgies, anal or whatever else they demand). Unless RLC gets more sex from tenants and guests/visitors in the near future then, if not, these chatters will give up and leave because they want sex now!!! My hope is to see some skin while the girl does "real life activities" within the walls of the apartment only.
   What is the definition of porn? What is the definition of voyeur? What is the definition of "real life"? I am sure my answers differ from others but then again - the chatters know it all. Some should open their F'N mind.
     Rob1 - enjoy your time away and maybe chat down the road or maybe not since I might soon follow you (also, there are less constructive forum posts by others lately). Maybe one of the other sites will have a similar type chatbox. Cheers.

A little more of Desiree Multi Tasking
(Image Content No Longer Available)

Desiree accidentally takes the radiator for walk instead of the dog.
(Image Content No Longer Available)

Couldn't agree more. I hinted at this in a recent post but, being a relatively new member, didn't want to overstep the mark.
This is the reason that I don't enter the chatbox. Same people , same crap nearly every day.
There has been a very interesting conversation going on this evening about a  forthcoming uk based voyeur project between its creator and others in lieu of anything much happening on RCL, but I'm sure the usual suspects will be on later as they normally are talking their usual rubbish.
 

Is this the rant section of the forums? Yes? Good, here we go then:
I am getting sick and tired of the girls of the B1 and B2 being accused of being prostitutes without any proof. I can't be on the chatbox for more than an hour before someone starts suggesting the girls are selling themselves for money or gifts. In most cases it's just an opinion that gets thrown out there, some chatters even have "proof", that later turns out to be some conversation that has been falsely or incompletely translated, or something that they saw on the cameras that gets misinterpreted or completely taken out of context.
I'm done with it. It takes the joy out of the chatroom for me. I tried poking holes in the theories, or suggesting alternative, more reasonable explanations, but it's like talking to a brick wall.
So from this moment forward, anyone who posts any more of those accusations on the chat, without proper proof to back it up, is going on my ignore list for a week. No matter who it is or for how long I've had pleasant chats with them, no exceptions. If that means I'll be staring at an (for me) empty chatbox within 24 hours, so be it.
I've had enough of this shit.

I rarely use chatrooms as they do tend to a bit " closed shop " in a lot of cases, hence forum post rather than chat box comments. I do keep an eye on the chat box on here though as it can keep me updated as to what it going on around rcl, particularly during the day.
Of the regular users that tend to be on at sometime most days, I think my favourites are Vampire, for raw emotion, because he doesn't hold back on saying it as it is, particularly if something is happening in one of the apartments that he is not keen on ( circa Irma, Stella and Alex ). Reallifecamfan51 because he can, out of the blue, come out with some classic one liner comments, so funny, comedy genius and, finally, Harry1949 ( I think) who hasn't been on for a few days but who I think is the most genuine person on the whole forum, along with Iloner but I haven't seen him in the chat box.
The down side is some of the groundless theories that are constantly spouted by some people during the incessant commentaries on some of the events that take place and tonight was no exception with the body painting in b1. Can't be specific but what b/s some people come out with. Here's what I saw, bearing in mind that I'm no keener on Alex than most other people on here: The girls were body painting, Alex arrived with new phone that Stella has been after, and some free booze. He stayed for a bit, enjoying the view of the girls dancing which they would have done whether he was there or not. He tried a couple of quick gropes but, hey, wouldn't you? When Belle was ready, he took her home and then fucked off. Suffice to say, Belle got home safely - and alone - in normal travelling time and Stella didn't have to give Alex a special thank you for her new phone, which she may have actually paid for with money, ever think of that?
Its a shame that Rcl aren't able to issue statements regarding the circumstances surrounding the current residents of all the apartments and any new arrivals which may serve to put an end to at least some of the ridiculous ideas in some peoples heads. At least we would know who is right and who isn't.

I rarely use chatrooms as they do tend to a bit " closed shop " in a lot of cases, hence forum post rather than chat box comments. I do keep an eye on the chat box on here though as it can keep me updated as to what it going on around rcl, particularly during the day.
Of the regular users that tend to be on at sometime most days, I think my favourites are Vampire, for raw emotion, because he doesn't hold back on saying it as it is, particularly if something is happening in one of the apartments that he is not keen on ( circa Irma, Stella and Alex ). Reallifecamfan51 because he can, out of the blue, come out with some classic one liner comments, so funny, comedy genius and, finally, Harry1949 ( I think) who hasn't been on for a few days but who I think is the most genuine person on the whole forum, along with Iloner but I haven't seen him in the chat box.
The down side is some of the groundless theories that are constantly spouted by some people during the incessant commentaries on some of the events that take place and tonight was no exception with the body painting in b1. Can't be specific but what b/s some people come out with. Here's what I saw, bearing in mind that I'm no keener on Alex than most other people on here: The girls were body painting, Alex arrived with new phone that Stella has been after, and some free booze. He stayed for a bit, enjoying the view of the girls dancing which they would have done whether he was there or not. He tried a couple of quick gropes but, hey, wouldn't you? When Belle was ready, he took her home and then fucked off. Suffice to say, Belle got home safely - and alone - in normal travelling time and Stella didn't have to give Alex a special thank you for her new phone, which she may have actually paid for with money, ever think of that?
Its a shame that Rcl aren't able to issue statements regarding the circumstances surrounding the current residents of all the apartments and any new arrivals which may serve to put an end to at least some of the ridiculous ideas in some peoples heads. At least we would know who is right and who isn't.